‘TWAS THE WEEK BEFORE CHRISTMAS

‘Twas the week before Christmas and all cross the nation

People prepared for the great celebration.

And any who suffered a cough or a sneeze

Wanted a drug for their symptoms to ease

.

So everyone contacted their health care providers

Knowing that they were the licensed prescribers

To getting appointments they showed dedication

Twas simply a must to have right medication

.

The clinical leads checked protocols twice

(Ensuring compliance with guidance from NICE)

Relaying their learning to practice clinicians

On management options for Christmas conditions

.

There’s a tablet for when you’re deficient in joy

A tablet for when you’re not given that toy

A tablet to counter the courage that’s Dutch

A tablet for when you have eaten too much

.

A tablet for all of the stress of the crackers

A tablet to give to the washing up slackers

A tablet to help you put up with Aunt Jean

A tablet to keep you awake for the Queen

.

Whilst sitting on sofas and watching TV

And longing for chocolates that hang on the tree

By taking these drugs nobody need fear

They’re sure to stay healthy right through to New Year

.

On Codeine, on Senna, on Brufen, on Zantac

On Statin, on Zoton, on Calpol, on Prozac,

And so that the cooking, guilt free they can shirk

There’s always a note to say they can’t work

.

The Medicine Management Advisor’s away

I don’t think he’s working on this Christmas Day

But I heard him exclaim, ‘ere he drove out of sight

HAPPY CHRISTMAS TO ALL AND TO ALL A GOODNIGHT


To see ‘How the Grinch Stole General Practice’s Christmas’, click here

To read ‘A Primary Care Christmas Carol – Stave One’, click here

A Primary Care Christmas Carol – Complete

A PRIMARY CARE CHRISTMAS CAROL

Stave Onein which Scrooge reveals how burnt out he is

Old Dr Marley was dead. As dead as the NHS would be within a couple of years if things didn’t start to improve soon. And, as far as Dr Ebenezer Scrooge was concerned, Jacob Marley was better off out of it. Scrooge and Marley had been long term partners and Scrooge greatly missed his former colleague who had died several years earlier. This was not the result of any affection he had had for the man, that was not in Scrooge’s nature, but rather on account of the fact that, due to the national shortage of GPs, he had been unable to find a replacement, and his workload had consequently increased beyond the point of being manageable.

It was Christmas Eve and Scrooge was sat at the desk in his consulting room. It was nearly three in the afternoon. Morning surgery had only just finished and this was now what was laughably called his ‘lunch break’. An email flashed up on his computer screen. It was from the CCG wishing him a merry Christmas.

‘Bah!’ muttered Scrooge to himself. ‘Humbug! If they really wanted my Christmas to be merry, then perhaps they and NHS England could have agreed that I didn’t have to make up the Advanced Access hours, lost from not opening the surgery on Christmas Day, later in the week. Every idiot’, he continued, ‘who goes about with ‘Merry Christmas’ on his lips should be submitted to unnecessary colonoscopic examination and be forced to reflect on the experience for the purposes of revalidation.’

Dr Scrooge was not one to enjoy Christmas, and being encouraged to be merry served only to darken his already black mood still further. The situation was not helped by the arrival of a receptionist who announced her presence with a knock on his already open door.

‘Sorry to trouble you Dr Scrooge, but the Salvation Army band are playing Christmas carols in the car park and are asking if you would like to make a donation.’ She handed him a leaflet informing him that this Christmas many people would not have anywhere to sleep due to the lack of hospital beds resulting from years of chronic NHS underfunding. Scrooge sighed – this was nothing he didn’t already know. Only that morning he had been asked to arrange a review over the holiday period of a patient that was about to be discharged, a little earlier than was ideal, from the local, desperately overworked, hospital. Though he regretted being unable to promise that level of care, his refusal then had been unequivocal and he was no more minded now, at his own personal expense, to start financially propping up a system left destitute by the establishment. As far as he was concerned, he was already paying quite enough tax and, given that he had just learnt that the security of his pension was now somewhat precarious, he felt it was unlikely that he would change his mind on the matter. He stood up and slammed the door in his informant’s face. Sensibly, the receptionist interpreted that as a ‘No’ and scuttled back to where her colleagues were celebrating Christmas with a box of mince pies and a tube of Prosecco and pink peppercorn Pringles – the latter, notwithstanding the alliteration, surely an ill advised flavour choice, regardless of the season.

Scrooge had been invited to share in the festivities but he had no desire to do so. Nor did he have time. Instead he returned to his computer screen and started the never ending task of clearing his inbox of lab results, hospital letters, and prescription requests. He’d barely started when there was another knock at the door. Scrooge barked out a ‘What is it?’ and the door swung open to reveal the ST3 who had been with the practice since August. Dr Robert Cratchit was a highly capable doctor though one who lacked confidence in his own ability. To Scooge’s dismay he was wearing a Christmas jumper.

‘What do you want? Can’t you see I’m busy?

These words were not unfamiliar to Dr Cratchit, who, over the previous five months, had heard them frequently from the man who purported to be his trainer. In fact, so frequently had he heard them that, for a time, he had used them to start all consultations with patients, imagining them to be the profession’s approved opening words for all doctor/patient interactions. A failed attempt at the CSA and the associated considerable expense of applying to sit the exam again had indeed taught him much. Familiarity however did not make it any easier for Dr Cratchit to approach a man who never offered advice without showing contempt for the one who asked for it. For although Scrooge had received training on giving feedback, he had, much to the dismay of his appraiser, consistently failed to demonstrate any change in his behaviour as a result of such practice improving activity.

‘I was j-just wondering if it would be convenient if I were to g-go’ Cratchit stammered. ‘I’m only supposed to do one clinical session today and, though the planned patch t-tutorial for this afternoon has been cancelled, I thought that, since you allocated me all the visits, you m-might let me skip off a little early this afternoon. It is Christmas after all and I would so appreciate having the extra time to be with m-my family.’

Scrooge glowered. ‘Of course it’s not convenient. And I don’t suppose you’ll be offering to work a couple of extra Saturday mornings in lieu of the day you’ll no doubt be taking off tomorrow. That’s the trouble with young doctors these days. No commitment’

The ST3 smiled faintly and waited nervously. ‘Go on then, leave’ Scrooge eventually conceded, ‘But if anything goes amiss this afternoon and I’m compelled to reflect on some significant event or another, I know where my reflections will lay the blame. Just make sure you’re in early on Thursday.’ Cratchit thanked Scrooge and slipped away, leaving the burnt out old clinician alone with his thoughts and the prospect of a three hour afternoon surgery.

As things turned out the rest of the day was mercifully quiet with Christmas Eve being the one afternoon of the year which provided the general population with something more interesting to do than seek medical advice regarding their minor health concerns. As a result, Scrooge locked up the practice early and arrived home before nine. He’d stopped on the way to pick up a bite to eat but, having consumed it en route, the only thing he had to look forward to on arriving back was, as most evenings, the prospect of going to bed.

As he got out of his car, a fog hung about the driveway of the old house, that he’d bought some years before. Scrooge approached the front door, the fog seeming to cling to him as he walked. It was then that he noticed, in place of the ancient door knocker, what was clearly the face of his old partner, Dr Marley. The apparition lasted but a moment before Scrooge, unsettled by the sighting, hurried on, unlocking the door and subsequently forcing a pile of unsolicited medical periodicals to one side as he entered the house. He locked the door behind him and climbed the stairs to his bedroom.

Scrooge undressed and put on his night attire. As he sat gazing into the middle distance, contemplating once more the strange appearance of the door knocker, there came an unexpected ringing sound that filled him with inexplicable dread. Scrooge scrambled in his pocket for his phone. However, as the caller’s number was withheld, he, as was his custom, ignored what was almost certainly a nuisance call and continued his preparations for bed. And then he saw it. A sight that caused him to be more horrified than he’d ever been before – even more horrified than that morning when his appointments had included seven heart sink patients and three more complaining of being ‘Tired all the time’. Before him, as unwelcome as critical emails from the head of Medicines Management, stood the ghost of Dr Jacob Marley.

Scrooge, nothing if not a man of reason, rose up and spoke to the spectre in an accusatory tone.

‘I don’t believe in you’ he said.

‘You don’t believe in most NICE guidelines and yet they exist’ countered the phantom.

‘That’s true’, Scrooge was forced to concede and with that he sat back down in his chair. He paused a moment then, looking the ghost full in the face and acknowledging his existence, asked the reason for his visit.

‘I have come to warn you Ebenezer. There is yet a chance that you may escape what has become my fate. I am condemned to walk the earth for all eternity burdened by these chains – chains composed of nonsensical bureaucratic demands imposed on me by those who understand nothing of medicine and seek to use the profession for their own political ends. You have forgotten, Ebenezer, what being a doctor is really all about. You have forgotten the joy that your work once brought you and now you practice as a mere shadow of the clinician you once longed to be. You’re burnt out Ebenezer. Something needs to change.’

‘Blimey!’ said Scrooge, ‘like that’s going to happen’.

‘You will be haunted by three spirits,’ continued the ghost, ignoring Scrooge’s cynicism. ‘They will teach you all that you need to know. Without them you cannot hope to shun the path I now tread. Expect the first when the clock strikes one’.

And with that the ghost of Jacob Marley departed, groaning incoherent sounds of lamentation and dragging the weight of his chains behind him. Scrooge stood motionless for he knew not how long. Then, mindful of his need for rest, he climbed into bed. Picking up a copy of the BJGP, he fell asleep upon an instant.

A PRIMARY CARE CHRISTMAS CAROL

Stave Twoin which Scrooge fondly remembers

Dr Scrooge woke in a cold sweat and sat bolt upright in his bed. This was not unusual for, in recent weeks, the stress associated with an impending visit by the CQC had frequently disturbed his sleep. Moments later, however, his thoughts were diverted from the need to get on and write those mandatory protocols on the secure overnight storage of hand towels and the safe use of the stairs, when, at one o’clock precisely, his bedroom door creaked open and a strange looking fellow crept into the room. Over a woollen cardigan he wore a tweed jacket complete with leather patches on the elbows; on the end of his nose was perched a pair of pince nez glasses; and in his hand he carried a battered black Gladstone bag.

‘Are you the spirit, sir, whose coming was foretold me?” asked Scrooge.

‘Indeed I am’ the apparition replied. ‘I am the Ghost of General Practice Past. I’ve come straight from a meeting of my celestial Balint Group. And my, what catharsis we enjoyed there this evening. Your former partner, Jacob, was in attendance. He’s a good chap, a jolly fine fellow. But enough of that. Come along with me – he has sent me to show you what General Practice once was.’

The spirit held out his hand and Scrooge instinctively took it. As he did so, Scrooge felt himself being lifted, as if weightless, from his bed. The spirit led him to, and then through, the wall of the bedroom and out into the night air. They journeyed until they found themselves in the oak panelled surroundings of what appeared to be a gentleman’s club. A number of elderly men sat together in high backed leather chairs. All were doctors, enjoying a glass of port after a drug sponsored Christmas meal. With them was a medical student who was attached to one of their number.

‘Listen to these chaps’, the spirit said to Ebenezer, ‘Each and every one is a fine fellow – a jolly good chap. You could learn a thing or two from what decent sorts like these have to say.’

The men were taking it in turns in regaling the medical student with tales of their working life.

‘Of course, these days, the youngsters have it easy. They only work a mere seventy two hours a week you know. In my day it was eighty one’

‘Eighty one hours? You had it easy. It was all internal cover when I did my house jobs. In real terms, I did a hundred hours a week’

‘Only a hundred hours a week? Luxury. I was running a GP practice single handedly by the time I was 23.. On call every hour of every day.’

‘That’s right. We had it tough as GPs. One hundred and sixty eight hours a week we worked – and, of course, we had to provide all the obstetric care – home deliveries every day’

‘And most of those were C.Sections – we had do the operations with only kitchen utensils for surgical instruments and a bottle of brandy for an anaesthetic’

‘Aye – and if you tell that to the medical students of today, they’ll not believe you.’

The spirit indicated that it was time to move on and Ebenezer readily agreed. He’d heard it all before. The walls of the room blurred and faded and gradually, as things came back into focus, Scrooge realised that they were now high above rolling hills. Passing over snow covered fields and lanes, they travelled until they came at last to a small town and stopped by a house that Scrooge recognised as his childhood home. Outside the dwelling, a car pulled up. The familiar figure of his family GP clambered out of the vehicle and made her way up the garden path to the front door. A woman was waiting anxiously for her arrival. They exchanged a warm greeting after which the woman led the doctor up the stairs to a room in which a boy lay, pale and in obvious distress.

‘Thank you for coming doctor, I know you’re busy but I didn’t know what to do. Ebenezer’s usually such a healthy child but he seems now to be struggling with his breathing.’

‘It’s no trouble Mrs Scrooge – let’s take a look at him.’

The doctor knelt down by the bedside and smiled at the boy who managed to smile weakly back. Ebenezer liked the doctor. He’d visited her a number of times over the years but this was the first time she’d ever visited him. The doctor asked a few questions and then carefully examined the boy, paying particularly careful attention to his chest. When she was done, she turned back to his mother and gave her the diagnosis.

‘I’m afraid it looks like we’ve a case of pneumonia on our hands. He’s really quite poorly and will be needing the help of my colleagues at the hospital. We best get him there as soon as possible.’

Scrooge looked on and wondered how she could say such a thing without a computer and a pulse oximeter to enable her to assess the risk of sepsis. She hadn’t appeared to even consider a CURB-65 score. None the less, a few phone calls were made and the doctor, placing her hand on Mrs Scrooge’s shoulder as if to say that everything would be alright, made her goodbyes,having given an assurance that an ambulance would soon arrive, an expectation Scrooge thought fanciful in the extreme,

‘Do you remember that day Ebenezer?’ asked the Ghost of General Practice Past.

‘I do,’ Ebenezer whispered, taken aback at how emotional he was now feeling. The spirit smiled to himself as he sensed that Scrooge was close to tears. He loved catharsis – catharsis was good. ‘She was such a lovely doctor’, Scrooge continued. ‘Always so kind and reassuring. She’d become almost a part of the family having visited so frequently during the last days of my father’ final illness. She always seemed to have time. It was because of her that I decided to become a doctor. The way she practiced medicine caused me to realised that being a doctor was a wonderful job to have. She seemed to me to be a fortunate woman.”

‘A fortunate woman indeed’ agreed the spirit. ‘A fortunate women and…’ he paused, thrown for a moment, ‘…a good chap’. The spirit hesitated again and then added, as if to try and reassure himself, ‘She was a jolly fine fellow.’

With that the ghost again took Scrooge’s hand and soon they were once more travelling through the night sky. On and on they flew, until they came to a village hall decorated brightly with all manner of coloured lights. A Christmas tree strewn with tinsel and still more lights stood by the entrance. Inside, Scrooge recognised the staff of his GP training practice. Some talked, others laughed and a number danced enthusiastically to music provided by a band. All were clearly enjoying the opportunity to relax and have fun together. A portly man then stood up and called for a bit of hush. It was Dr Fezziwig, the senior partner of the practice and Ebenezer’s one time trainer.

‘A moment’s silence if you please everybody. If I might say a few words, thank you all so much for coming this evening. I hope you’re having a good time.’ He paused a moment and then, with a feigned suggestion of doubt in his voice, questioned the crowd, ‘You are having a good time, aren’t you?’ Those gathered gave the desired response with cheers and roars that left nobody in any doubt that indeed they were. Fezziwig continued. ‘I want to thank you all for your help this past year. The partners appreciate your hard work, doing what can be a very difficult job. We couldn’t manage without you.’ More cheers followed together with a few calls for a pay rise. Fezziwig then concluded by wishing everyone a very Merry Christmas and insisting that everyone took advantage of the free bar that he and the partners were glad to provide. ‘Only keep an eye on young Dr Scrooge. He’s a fine young doctor but Ebenezer’s not as experienced as we older GPs and I’m not sure he can take his drink! We don’t want a repeat of last months incident when he woke up naked on the delicatessen counter at Sainsbury’s!’

‘Now he does seem like a good chap – a jolly fine fellow’ declared the spirit, beaming as if the natural order had been restored to where chaos had once threatened to reign. ‘He’s a good, fine, decent, jolly chap of a fellowy sort if ever I saw one.’

The Ghost of General Practice Past turned to Scrooge and looked him straight in the eye. ‘But what of him?’ the spirit asked drawing his companion’s attention to a young man who was accepting the gentle ribbing at the hands of the senior colleague he respected so highly. He was sat laughing alongside various members of staff with whom he was sharing a table.

‘I was so happy then’ Scrooge told the ghost. ‘He was such a wise man and so willing to share what he had learnt. And we were such a great team, all so eager to support one another. Back then, there seemed to be so much more time. Why did everything change? And how did I become so resentful of the job I used to love?’

‘Something certainly changed – something that shouldn’t have’ replied the ghost. ‘At least, not in the way it has. Perhaps something needs to change again. Perhaps something needs to be recovered. But it is for you to decide what and how. As for me, my time is up. We must return. You have other guests to welcome tonight.’

And in less time than it takes for EMIS to crash on a busy Monday morning, Scrooge was back in his room, alone with his thoughts. It was nearly two in the morning.

A PRIMARY CARE CHRISTMAS CAROL

Stave Threein which our tale takes (trigger warning) a darker turn

In the few minutes he had to think before the next ghostly visitor was due to arrive, Scrooge reflected on the events of the evening so far and wondered if he should try to claim a few hours of CPD. However, anxious as to how his appraiser might respond to such revelations and fearful that his reflections may be used against him, he concluded, as many before him, that it would be best not to put his thoughts down in writing.

He then realised that it was almost half past two. Was he not to be visited again tonight after all? But within a moment of his beginning to wonder this, he was woken from his reverie by the sound of his bedroom door bursting open and the arrival of a rather flustered looking figure entering the room. She was carrying a pile of papers in one hand whilst tapping into the mobile phone she held with the other.

‘I’m sorry to keep you waiting’, the spectre began. ‘I’ve been so busy tonight and the last chap I visited had several issues that he wanted me to provide spiritual insight on. Blow me if he didn’t have a list! Now what seems to be the problem? I am the Ghost of General Practice Present. Did you have any ideas, concerns or expectations as to how I might haunt you?’

Scrooge looked back at the apparition somewhat non-plussed. He hadn’t asked for the visit and, other than his previous encounters that night, had no experience of consulting with individuals from beyond the grave. Though highly concerned by the present turn of events and expecting to find the whole thing highly disagreeable, he had very little idea as to quite how the encounter should progress. Consequently, Scrooge said nothing.

‘Oh dear,’ said the ghost, unnerved by Scrooge’s silence, ‘This is awkward. I told Marley that there was little point in my visiting you without you being willing to see me. You see it’s so hard to help somebody unless they realise they have a problem and want to be helped.’ Still Scrooge found himself lost for words.

Rather than using the silence as a technique for therapeutic communication, the ghost laid the papers that she had been carrying down upon Scrooge’s bed and started flipping through the pages. ‘I’m sure there is a guideline for this situation somewhere. Give me a minute and I’ll be with you as soon as I find it. I don’t want to get this wrong.’ A few minutes passed, at the end of which the ghost seemed to have found what it was that she was looking for. ‘Ah yes, that’s it – come with me. I’m to show you how Christmas is being spent by others this year. Only I’m running short of time so we’ll have to make it quick’.

Once again, Scrooge was taken by the hand but, somewhat to his disappointment, she led him down the stairs in the conventional fashion before continuing through the front door and out into the night. ‘I’m afraid that these days we don’t employ the use of magic flight’, the spirit explained, ‘There’s no evidence for it, you see. It’s all evidence based hauntings these days’.

The fog had thickened making it difficult to see where they were going but the ghost still had hold of her phone and had entered the post code of their destination into Google maps. Before long they reached a block of flats and proceeded to climb the communal stairs. On the second floor, they passed through the wall into the home of a young family, the spirit assuring Scrooge as they did so, that the Celestial Institute for Ethereal Excellence had approved, in highly selected cases, what was known in the profession as quantum tunnelling, provided said cases met stringent eligibility criteria.

The flat bore witness to the fact that it was Christmas Day. The mantelpiece and sideboard were covered with Christmas cards and coloured paper chains were hanging from the ceiling. In the corner was a Christmas tree under which a three year old boy was happily making good use of the colouring set he had recently unwrapped. He stood up and walked into the kitchen where his parents were preparing dinner. They turned to him and noticed that he was covered in red spots. Immediately his mother emptied the pint glass of Prosecco she was drinking and used it to perform the ‘tumbler test’, her anxiety being heightened all the more when the rash failed to disappear. She pressed the speed dial button on her phone and called ‘111’.

‘I’m worried about my son – he’s covered in spots’ she exclaimed to the call handler. ‘No – he seems well in himself…No – no vomiting or fever…No – no headache or tummy pain…No – no catastrophic loss of blood and No – he has just the one head’. The list of negatives continued until the questioner focused in on the rash. ‘Well it’s almost as if he’s been marking himself with a red felt tip pen!’ The women listened to the call handler for a few moments longer before ending the call.

‘What did they say?’ her partner asked.

‘Something about a non-blanching rash being possible meningitis and that it’s better to be safe than sorry. They’re sending an ambulance.’

‘Bloomin’ right too. Now let me refill your glass, we can’t have you sober when it arrives!’

The Ghost of Christmas Present indicated to Scrooge that it was time to move on. Their next stop was just across the stairwell. Passing once more through the walls of the property, Scrooge recognised Mrs Gray, the frail elderly lady who lived there, as one of his patients. She was nearing the end of her life due to her having advanced metastatic disease. A single Christmas card lay face down on the dining room table, alongside of which was a box of chocolates she had bought for herself in an attempt to make Christmas Day, the fifth she’d have spent alone since the death of her husband, at least a little special. She knew it would probably be her last. As Scrooge looked on, the woman picked up the chocolates and shuffled slowly across the room and then, for want of anyone else to give them to, placed them in the kitchen bin.

‘What’s she doing?’ Scrooge asked the spirit.

‘She doesn’t think you’d approve if she ate them’ replied the ghost, who then proceeded to point to a letter held to the fridge door by a magnet commemorating the Queen’s Silver Jubilee. It was from Scrooge’s medical practice informing her that her recent routine blood tests had revealed that she had a slightly elevated HBA1c and that she was therefore classified as ‘pre diabetic’. Included with the letter was a leaflet giving helpful advice on healthy eating.

Scrooge stood staring at the woman. He realised that, though if asked to relay the ins and outs of all her most recent blood tests he would have been up to the task, in recent years at least, he’d not really known her at all.

The spirit had left the flat and Scrooge hurried to catch her up. They walked together without talking until they came to a house that Scrooge had never visited before. Here they stopped and stood outside the window of a dimly lit room. Peering in through the poorly drawn curtains they could see the figure of Bob Cratchit. He was sat, his head in his hands, surrounded by various medical text books. To his left was a half empty bottle of scotch and a packet of antidepressants. He was writing a note.

Scrooge turned to the Ghost of General Practice. ‘What’s he doing?’ he asked.

‘Struggling’ she replied.

‘But why? He’s such a good doctor’.

‘He is indeed. But he doesn’t know it. He has come to believe that he has to be perfect – that every guideline must be followed and a failure to do so will result in legal action being taken against him. He’s taken on the burden that comes from believing that medicine has the answer to every problem experienced by a broken society. He thinks it’s all down to him. He has been worn down by the constant demand from both society and the profession that he must perform better – that good enough is not good enough. He’s exhausted by the never ending assessment of his performance and crushed by the weight of the responsibility he feels. He lives in the constant fear that it’ll all be his fault if anything bad ever happens. He too feels all alone this Christmas.’

‘But this afternoon? He asked to leave early to spend some time with his family’

‘Indeed he did but the truth is that he hasn’t much in the way of a family – just a couple of friends he thinks of as family. In reality he had hoped to meet those friends for a drink but things didn’t quite work out the way they were planned. When he left the surgery late yesterday he went back to check on one of the patients he’d visited. Their condition had deteriorated and he arranged an admission but he was left feeling guilty and anxious. As a result he didn’t think he’d make very good company. And besides, he was worried about his CSA exam and thought the time would be better spent preparing for that.’

‘But he’ll pass the exam easily’ Scrooge exclaimed. ‘He’s come on leaps and bounds since that unfortunate misunderstanding the first time round. The patients love him – and the staff. He’ll make a great GP’.

‘Have you ever told him that?’

Scrooge fell silent. Perhaps he could have been a bit more supportive, encouraged a little more. Perhaps he could have helped him steer a course through the mass of expectation and enabled him to distinguish between what was genuinely important and what could appropriately be ignored. Perhaps he could have been the kind of trainer Fezziwig had been to him – one who, despite the changes enforced on the profession, could still see the joy of working in general practice and convey a little of that to the next generation – one who would fight for what was worth fighting for rather than retreating into cynicism, bitterness, and resentment.

‘I never knew he felt so alone. I never knew he was finding it so hard.’

‘Did you ever ask?’

Scrooge’s head fell. ‘Can I speak to him now?’

‘I’m afraid not. He won’t be able hear you, and what’s more our time is up. We must go.’

‘But I must do something’

‘That’s as maybe – but you have another appointment to keep. You must meet the Ghost of General Practice Yet To Come.’

The ghost started back towards Scrooge’s home. Scrooge himself lingered a little longer at the window in the hope that Cratchit would see him and appreciate his concern. Finally he turned his back on the scene and trudged slowly after the ghost who was now some yards ahead of him. Behind him, Cratchit slipped silently into the deepest of deep sleeps.

The spirit accompanied Scrooge back to his room but, before she left, she had one small request.

‘I’d be most grateful if you could fill in this form by way of giving feedback on my performance this evening. And it would be very helpful if you could indicate whether you’d feel able to recommend me to your friends and family…’

Regretting the choice of words even as she spoke them, an awkward silence arose between them. The spirit looked at Scrooge – Scrooge looked back

‘…or perhaps just an acquaintance…a passer by even?’

Sensing that now was clearly not the time, the Spirit said a hurried goodbye and left, leaving Scrooge alone with his thoughts. He couldn’t stop thinking about what he’d seen. He tried to convince himself it was all a dream, that none of it was real. Had things really become this bad? And could the future be worse? He had a feeling he was about to find out.

A PRIMARY CARE CHRISTMAS CAROL

Stave Four – in which the future appears far from bright.

Alone again, Scrooge, out of force of habit, checked his phone for notifications. No red circle had appeared in the corner of the Facebook icon to indicate that someone, somewhere cared about what was on his mind. This was not unexpected as it had been a long time since anyone had ‘liked’ him – still longer since he’d been loved. It was a surprise to him, therefore, when the phone vibrated alerting him to the arrival of a text message.

‘This is to remind you that your appointment with the Ghost of General Practice Yet To Come is scheduled for now. Please access your Babylon Wealth account and prepare to speak to somebody with no soul’

Scrooge noticed a new app had appeared on his phone’s home screen. It glowed menacingly, demanding to be tapped. Scrooge couldn’t help thinking that ‘Babylon’ was a curious name for a company to chose to call itself, recalling, as he did from his days in Sunday School, how Babylon represented all that was evil, ‘the mother of earth’s abominations’ and a ‘dwelling place for demons’. Perhaps, he concluded, it was strangely fitting after all.

Against his better judgement, Scrooge opened the application and was greeted by a disclaimer making it clear that any advice given was only valid for minor, self limiting medical conditions and any harm that resulted from Babylon clinicians failing to appreciate a more serious underlying problem was not their responsibility. Those experiencing more complex health concerns were directed to approach less forward thinking health providers. Scrooge was requested to indicate his acceptance of these conditions and, having complied, the screen gave out a burst of light and there then appeared what looked for all the world to be a businessman dressed in an executive suit.

‘Welcome to Babylon Wealth,’ the man announced. ‘where your health needs are our business opportunity’. He smiled a self-satisfied smile, which Scrooge did not find reassuring.

‘Are you the Spirit of General Practice Yet To Come?’ Scrooge enquired.

The spirit’s smile wavered a little. ‘Is that what The Ghost of Christmas Present called me? She is so yesterday. I’ve been rebranded and, from now on, I am to be known simply as ‘The Future’. Exciting isn’t it? Now, how can I profit from you?’

‘I believe you’re supposed to show me my future’

‘Yes of course, but I don’t have time to talk to you about that in any depth. So, in the interests of efficiency, I’d like to request that you utilise this corporate video feed. If you’ve any further questions you’ll be required to make a further appointment. You will receive an invoice for the services I have provided today and your account will be automatically debited the requisite amount. Thank you for using Babylon Wealth. Have a nice day.’

Lost for words, Scrooge tapped the link that had appeared on his phone and continued to gaze at the screen at what seemed to be, if such a thing was possible, a broadcast from the future. It began with an aerial view of a huge featureless building over which an audio commentary played. “Welcome to the world’s first fast health outlet. – Where health is cheap and time is short”. A notice board at the entrance of the building came into focus revealing that ‘The National Wellbeing Centre’ was open 24 hours a day, 365 days of the year. Two enormous panels straddled the entrance bearing images of the Secretary of State for Health and the President of the National Pharmaceutical Board. They were pictured smiling benignly down upon the multitude who were milling around a large reception area.

As the camera roamed around, the audio commentary explained how no appointment was necessary but that, on arrival, patients were required to utilise electronic panels positioned in the foyer to answer a series of questions by way of ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ answers only. As a result of the responses that were given, each individual would then be assigned to a wellbeing advisor. If, and only if, it was deemed necessary that face to face contact should ensue, they would then wait outside one of the 666 consulting rooms housed within the complex until their allocated interaction was scheduled. Patients were advised that only objective quantifiable, symptoms could be dealt with and that treatment options would be determined solely on the basis of the medico-economic considerations pertinent to each individual case. Reassurances were offered that a number of payment options were available.

Around the foyer, electronic panels displayed information for consumers alongside a number of company disclaimers:

“Due to many drugs now being of limited availability, if medication is advised, the sourcing of that medication is entirely the responsibility of the customer.”

“Please be assured that we respect your anonymity and consider it of paramount importance to maintain the highest levels of confidentiality. In order to guarantee this, no wellbeing advisor will consult with the same client on more than one occasion and no personal communication is permitted between clinicians. At all times, to minimise any humanising of the clinical interaction, a mask must be worn over the face.”

“The National Wellbeing Centre cannot accept responsibility”

“Strict quality control measures are in place to guarantee the optimal outcome of each clinical interaction. Each consultation is electronically monitored and any deviation from company protocols will result in disciplinary action being taken against the clinician concerned.”

The announcements seemed endless, each, it appeared to Scrooge, alienating the individual in need still further from the connection they craved with somebody who just might care enough to show a little concern. Patients were managed without any warmth or compassion – processed by a system that existed solely for the benefit the state that had created it.

As Scrooge continued to watch, the announcements kept flashing across the screens, hypnotising those whose eyes were drawn lifelessly to their incessant messages. Dehumanised, everyone became the same – And that same was nothing more than a reservoir of data.

“Please be aware that displays of emotion are not encouraged in consultations and tissues are therefore not provided in the consultation rooms.”

“Customers will not be permitted to leave the centre until the requisite post interaction forms are completed. Not only does the filling of these forms provide the essential feedback necessary to identify suboptimal clinician performance, the personal data requested allows us to identify those agencies from whom we will profit most by our facilitating their communication with you.”

“Everybody here at the National Welfare Centre wishes you, and your purchases, a very merry Consumertide.”

And then, finally, before the cycle of messages started once more, one last announcement:

“Turmeric is available from the kiosk in the foyer”

The camera returned to a view of the outside of the building and Scrooge caught a glimpse of a small panel attached to the wall next to the main entrance. He paused the video and expanded the image to take a closer look. He could just make out the words that were inscribed on the ill maintained copper plate.

‘This facility was erected on the derelict site of what was once known as a GP medical centre. Drs J. Marley and E. Scrooge worked here for many years providing a form of medical provision which today is only of historical interest. The medical centre operated with the quaint intent to provide medical care that was responsive to patient needs. Dr Marley’s untimely death left Dr Scrooge struggling as he found it impossible to replace his former partner. He continued for a time supported by a series of doctors in training, but, after a personal tragedy struck the medical centre, it was no longer considered fit to remain a training practice. Dr Scrooge continued alone for a brief time, but the pressure of working in such an inefficient manner soon proved too much and he himself succumbed to a stress related illness. Happily, his demise proved the catalyst for the development of the progressive wellbeing centre that we benefit from today.’

Scrooge could not believe what he had witnessed. It struck him that there had at no point been any mention of there being any doctors present in the running of the well-being centre. It was almost as if there was now nobody providing a professional opinion, nobody making a judgement, nobody applying a bit of wisdom and that clinical algorithms were being used to make each and every decision. Were there, he wondered, any doctors still in existence at all? Perhaps, in the future, nobody wanted to be one. The questions kept coming. Was this really the future of the health service that once, years previously, he had been so proud to be a part? What about Cratchit? What did the ‘personal tragedy’ refer to? And what of his own future? Could any of this be changed?

Scrooge tapped frantically on his phone seeking a further appointment with the Ghost of General Practice Yet To Come. Fortunately, for all the faults of Babylon Wealth, having made the appropriate additional payment, an appointment was easy to come by, and soon, the business-like figure of the spectre, who had been so brusque with him earlier, appeared on the screen once more.

‘Good Spirit’ Scrooge implored, ‘Assure me that I may yet change these shadows you have shown me by an altered life’

The spirit laughed. ‘It’ll take more than one doctor changing to alter the future of the health service. That’s the trouble with you people. Too often you think it’s all down to you’. The spirit made a poor attempt at a Clint Eastwood impersonation, ‘A doctor’s got to know his limitations.’

‘And besides, what’s your problem? What we’re doing merely reflects the ideology of the nation – that everything comes down to money. We measure and record data because data sells. What we understand at Babylon Wealth is that people are commodities. For example, we record an elevated cholesterol solely because we know there is somebody out there who is selling a product to reduce lipid levels and is willing to pay for the information we collect. We don’t care about people, only the wealth that they generate for us.’

‘But it’s not all about money’, Scrooge insisted.

‘Isn’t it?’ countered the spirit. ‘It seems to me that everyone has a price Dr Scrooge. Are you really the exception?’

‘Well maybe I do have a price, but if I have, it’s at least partly because, in recent years, with so much of the joy having been sucked out of the job, the only way that I’ve been in any way rewarded for my efforts is financially. There’s no appreciation from those who call the tune, no recognition of how difficult the job has become and nothing but constant demands that I must do better. Take appraisal – if a requirement to show year on year improvement doesn’t amount to saying that we’re not good enough as we are, I don’t know what is. Something has to change’.

‘Well good luck to you with that, Scrooge. I concede that, as a profession, challenging the status quo rather than capitulating to the spirit of the age whilst all the while laudably endeavouring to deliver its impossible demands would be a step in the right direction. But I can’t see it ever happening – you’re all too busy just trying to keep your head above water to organise a concerted campaign for change.’

‘But let me try, spirit. Let us try. I have learned my lesson well this night. Perhaps things need not turn out the way you have shown me”.

And with that, Scrooge deleted the Babylon Wealth app from his phone, never to be installed again. He got back into bed. He’d seen and heard quite enough.

A PRIMARY CARE CHRISTMAS CAROL

Stave Five in which we are given cause for hope

It was early morning when Scrooge woke. He sat up in bed and looked around the room. Everything appeared as normal and yet, within himself, he felt changed. Perhaps he was being naive but he felt a sense of optimism that he hadn’t known for years, daring to hope that things could get better.

It was then he remembered it was Christmas Day. ‘At least I think it is,’ he said to himself excitedly, ‘assuming that all three Spirits did indeed visit me last night and that I haven’t missed the great day completely’. He ran to the window and looked out. A light layer of snow coated the ground which heightened his excitement still further. And yes, a young lad was trying out a brand new bicycle, no doubt a freshly unwrapped Christmas present. Add to that the fact that one or two folk were making their way towards a church whose bells were ringing joyfully in the distance, it was, with the utmost certainty, Christmas morning.

But there was no time to lose. He had to check on Bob Cratchit. He dressed hurriedly and ran down the stairs and out into the crisp morning sunlight which reflected off the snow-covered ground. Scrooge got into his car and within a few minutes he was outside the house of his trainee. He knocked loudly on the door but there was no answer. He knocked again and, when there was no response, shouted through the letter box. Still there was only silence. Scrooge moved round to the side of the house and looked through the same window he had the previous evening, its curtains still only partly drawn. Cratchit was sat there, just as he had been when Scrooge and the Ghost of Christmas Present had left him earlier. Scrooge hammered on the window until, at last, he saw movement and a wave of relief surged through him. Slowly Cratchit stood up.

‘Open up Bob. Open up this instant. Do you hear?’ Scrooge shouted at him though the glass. ‘Open up. It’s Christmas Day!’

Cratchit, clearly half asleep and still the worse for the half bottle of whisky he’d drunk the night before, gradually stood up and made his way to the front door. Scrooge had never been one for outward displays of affection, but now, as Cratchit opened the door, Scrooge greeted him with a hug that was as welcome as it was unexpected.

‘How are you Bob? Are you alright?’

‘I’ve a bit of a headache if I’m honest. And not one that’s improved any by all your hollering. But why are you here? Has something happened? Have I done something wrong?’

‘On the contrary. If anyone is at fault it’s me, for not appreciating you more. And to show you that I mean it, what do you say to a partnership come August when you’ve completed your training? I’d be proud to call you my partner’

‘You must be desperate!’

‘Desperate? Of course I’m desperate! Have you seen the state of the health service? But that’s not the reason for my offering you a partnership. I would like you to help me change the way we do General Practice. It’s a conditional offer of course – conditional that is on you seeing some change. There’s no way I’d want you to commit to a lifetime of working the way we have of late.’

‘Well I guess I’ll have to think about it. But thank you. I didn’t realise that you thought I was up to the job’.

‘Of courses you’re up to the job. We all worry sometimes that we’re not though, so don’t be surprised if you find yourself questioning the fact – that’s normal! The trouble is that we’re all so anxious imaging that we have to be perfect. We’re not God you know – even though both the government and our patients sometimes expect us to act as though we were.’

‘Well I guess you’re right there’

‘Of course I’m right, I’m your trainer! Now, what’s with the whisky and the packet of antidepressants?’

Cratchit looked down at the ground. ‘I didn’t take any, just thought about it. I guess I was just feeling a little overwhelmed. I was being stupid”

‘It’s not stupid to feel overwhelmed. There’s no shame in being asked to do more than you can cope with. The only foolish thing is to not realise you need to say ‘No’ sometimes – that sometimes you need help and have to ask for it. I’ll try and make that easier for you from now on. Promise me though that you’ll not let your thoughts travel in such a dark direction again without letting me know.’

‘I’ll try not to – I promise.’

‘Excellent. Remember, we’re in this together.

Cratchit couldn’t quite believe what he was hearing and couldn’t stop himself voicing the question that was on his mind.’

‘Dr Scrooge,’ Cratchit began

‘It’s Ebenezer. Call me Ebenezer’.

Cratchit hesitated and then tried again. ‘Ebenezer.’ It seemed strange to hear the name spoken aloud, ‘I hope you don’t mind me saying this, but something seems different about you today. Has something happened?’

‘I rather think it has,’ said Scrooge. ‘As a profession we’re convinced everything’s wrong. A lot is of course, but I see now that if we can see what the problems are, then surely we stand a chance of making changes.’

‘But how?’

‘To be honest, I’m not quite sure. One thing would be our need to challenge the idea that medicine has all the answers. We need to say ‘No’ to the over medicalisation of life and be honest with both ourselves and our patients as to what we can and can’t do. Another thing would be that we have to be allowed to behave as the professionals we were trained to be. Once we were seen as people who could be trusted to make judgments in the best interests of patients. Now it seems we are seen as mere service providers, required to unquestionably follow guidelines regardless of how appropriate or otherwise that might be. It’s as if we’re not considered competent to try to decide what is best for our own individual patients. But one size doesn’t fit all. And so we need to fight to retain the doctor patient relationship that underpins good general practice and not allow it to be lost in the rush to conveyer belt medicine. We have to take back control over our work, make our own decisions as to how to apply medical knowledge to each individual situation and have the courage to resist the inappropriate demand to behave in ways that are imposed on us by government, pharmaceutical companies and society as a whole. That would mean better health for our patients and happier working lives for ourselves. That’s something I can aspire too, and knowing what it is I’m aiming for might just give me a chance of fathoming out how I might go about working towards it. At least, that’s my hope.”

Scrooge, in his excitement, had been pacing around the room. Now, pausing for breath, he sat down.

‘But that’s enough of all that for now. We can get together tomorrow and plan then just how exactly we’re going to do things differently. We’ll call it a practice away day. Just think of all the CPD hours we can claim! So, what are your plans for today?’

‘Well I had planned on a spot of revising for the CSA.’

‘Revising for the CSA. What nonsense – you’d pass that tomorrow with your eyes closed. Like it or not, you’re spending the day with me! We’ll have dinner at my house. I ordered a lorry load of food from Waitrose last week and there’s no way I can manage it all on my own. In fact there’s more than enough for two. Quick, go and get yourself sorted out. I’ve got an idea – one that might, for the first time in my career, satisfy my appraiser that my reflections have altered my practice!”

It wasn’t long before Cratchit was sat in the passenger seat of Scrooge’s car wondering where Scrooge might be taking him. A few minutes later they pulled up outside a block of flats and Scrooge led the way up the steps to the second floor. He knocked on a door.

“Who lives here?” asked Cratchit.

“Mrs Gray. She’s lived here alone since her husband, Timothy, died a few years ago. He was a short man. He had some kind of growth hormone deficiency I believe.’

Eventually, the door opened, and Mrs Gray stood there, evidently astonished to see her GP.

‘Good morning Mrs Gray. And a very merry Christmas to you.’

‘Well a very merry Christmas to you too Dr Scrooge. But what brings you here? Is it about the chocolates?’

‘Certainly not. We, that’s Dr Cratchit and I, have come to pick you up and take you off to my house for Christmas Day. What do you say? Will you come?’ Mrs Gray hesitated, uncertain if she should.

‘Please come, Mrs Gray. It would mean a lot to me’

‘But I’ve nothing to bring’.

Scrooge looked over her shoulder and saw the box of chocolates on the kitchen table. ‘What about those?’ Scrooge asked, ‘You don’t have to bring anything, but if you’d like to make a contribution…’

‘But I’m pre diabetic Dr Scrooge, I need to be careful what I eat’

‘Who told you that?’ said Scrooge, a broad grin forming on his face. ‘Not a doctor I hope. Believe me Mrs Gray, you shouldn’t believe everything we doctors tell you!’

With that, Mrs Gray tottered to the kitchen, picked up the chocolates and made her way back to the front door. Then, together with Scrooge and Cratchit, she made her way slowly down the stairs. Half way down, Scrooge stopped.

‘You go on Bob, I’ll catch you up in a moment. It’s just that I have a feeling that, as a GP, I am, for once, ideally positioned to reduce hospital admissions’

He ran back up the stairs and knocked on the door of the flat opposite that of Mrs Gray. A man opened the door.

‘I don’t want to appear interfering,’ Scrooge began, ‘but your son will develop a rash later this morning. When he does, try wiping it off with a damp cloth. Trust me, I’m a doctor!’

With that Scrooge turned and headed off back down the stairs leaving the man speechless behind him.

…………………………………

A couple of hours later, the two doctors and their elderly patient sat around a dining table enjoying Waitrose’s finest. As the meal drew to a close, Cratchit turned to Scrooge

‘I think I’ve made my decision’ he said.

‘What decision is that?’

‘I’d like to accept your offer of a partnership, if I pass the CSA that is’

‘That’s wonderful Bob, simply wonderful!’ Scrooge stood up and shook Crachit warmly by the hand and then, for the second time in the day, embraced him warmly. ‘This is excellent news – for me and for the practice. We should organise a party!’

Scrooge dashed out of the room and returned with a sheet of paper on which were listed all the practice staff, their names and telephone numbers.

‘And a party we shall have,’ declared Scrooge handing the list to Cratchit. ‘Start ringing round and invite anyone who’s free to join us here this evening. Perhaps someone will bring some of those Prosecco and pink peppercorn Pringles – are they really a thing? Only don’t let me drink too much. The last time I did that there was an incident at a local supermarket, the details of which you don’t want to know!’

‘Can I say something Dr Scrooge?’ Scrooge turned around and saw that Mrs Gray had got to her feet. With one hand she steadied herself by holding onto the table and with the other she was holding a glass of wine. ‘I’ve had a lovely time today and I want to thank you for all your kindness. I’d like to propose a toast, to both of you, the practice, and the NHS as a whole. It’s something my late husband used to say.’ She raised her glass higher. ‘God bless us, every one’, she said.

‘God bless us, every one’, repeated Scrooge and Cratchit, smiling as they raised and carefully tapped their glasses together.

…………………………………

In time, Cratchit passed his CSA and joined Scrooge in partnership. And for a while the practice prospered. Though their processes and procedures didn’t always meet with the full approval of the CQC, Scrooge and Cratchit always enjoyed the strong support of their patients. Scrooge’s experiences that night may not have changed the state of the NHS as a whole, but they did change how the NHS was manifested in one small corner of that great organisation. Scrooge became known as a doctor who cared for his patients more than he cared how he was thought of by those in power. He knew how to support others and recognised too how he himself needed the support of others. May that be truly said of us all.

And so, as Mr Gray observed, ‘God bless us, Every One!’


SCROOGE WILL BE BACK – IN ‘SCROOGE IN THE TIME OF CORONAVIRUS’

TO READ THE COMPLETE FOUR PART STORY, CLICK HERE.


Other medically related Christmas themed blogs:

To read ‘How the Grinch and Covid stole General Practices Christmas’, click here

To read ‘Twas the night before Christmas – 2020’, click here

To read ‘A Merry, and Resilient, Christmas’, click here

Other GP related stories:

To read ‘A Grimm Tale’, click here

To read ‘The Happy Practice – A Cautionary Tale’, click here

To read ‘The Three Little GPs and the Big Bad Secretary of State for Health’, click here

To read ‘A Mission Impossible’, click here

To read ‘A Bear called Paddington’, click here

To read ‘Mr Benn – the GP’, click here

To read ‘Jeeves and the Hormone Deficiency’, click here

A PRIMARY CARE CHRISTMAS CAROL – Stave Five

For Part 1, click here

For Part 2, click here

For Part 3, click here

For Part 4, click here

Stave Five in which we are given cause for hope

It was early morning when Scrooge woke. He sat up in bed and looked around the room. Everything appeared as normal and yet, within himself, he felt changed. Perhaps he was being naive but he felt a sense of optimism that he hadn’t known for years, daring to hope that things could get better.

It was then he remembered it was Christmas Day. ‘At least I think it is,’ he said to himself excitedly, ‘assuming that all three Spirits did indeed visit me last night and that I haven’t missed the great day completely’. He ran to the window and looked out. A light layer of snow coated the ground which heightened his excitement still further. And yes, a young lad was trying out a brand new bicycle, no doubt a freshly unwrapped Christmas present. Add to that the fact that one or two folk were making their way towards a church whose bells were ringing joyfully in the distance, it was, with the utmost certainty, Christmas morning.

But there was no time to lose. He had to check on Bob Cratchit. He dressed hurriedly and ran down the stairs and out into the crisp morning sunlight which reflected off the snow-covered ground. Scrooge got into his car and within a few minutes he was outside the house of his trainee. He knocked loudly on the door but there was no answer. He knocked again and, when there was no response, shouted through the letter box. Still there was only silence. Scrooge moved round to the side of the house and looked through the same window he had the previous evening, its curtains still only partly drawn. Cratchit was sat there, just as he had been when Scrooge and the Ghost of Christmas Present had left him earlier. Scrooge hammered on the window until, at last, he saw movement and a wave of relief surged through him. Slowly Cratchit stood up.

‘Open up Bob. Open up this instant. Do you hear?’ Scrooge shouted at him though the glass. ‘Open up. It’s Christmas Day!’

Cratchit, clearly half asleep and still the worse for the half bottle of whisky he’d drunk the night before, gradually stood up and made his way to the front door. Scrooge had never been one for outward displays of affection, but now, as Cratchit opened the door, Scrooge greeted him with a hug that was as welcome as it was unexpected.

‘How are you Bob? Are you alright?’

‘I’ve a bit of a headache if I’m honest. And not one that’s improved any by all your hollering. But why are you here? Has something happened? Have I done something wrong?’

‘On the contrary. If anyone is at fault it’s me, for not appreciating you more. And to show you that I mean it, what do you say to a partnership come August when you’ve completed your training? I’d be proud to call you my partner’

‘You must be desperate!’

‘Desperate? Of course I’m desperate! Have you seen the state of the health service? But that’s not the reason for my offering you a partnership. I would like you to help me change the way we do General Practice. It’s a conditional offer of course – conditional that is on you seeing some change. There’s no way I’d want you to commit to a lifetime of working the way we have of late.’

‘Well I guess I’ll have to think about it. But thank you. I didn’t realise that you thought I was up to the job’.

‘Of courses you’re up to the job. We all worry sometimes that we’re not though, so don’t be surprised if you find yourself questioning the fact – that’s normal! The trouble is that we’re all so anxious imaging that we have to be perfect. We’re not God you know – even though both the government and our patients sometimes expect us to act as though we were.’

‘Well I guess you’re right there’

‘Of course I’m right, I’m your trainer! Now, what’s with the whisky and the packet of antidepressants?’

Cratchit looked down at the ground. ‘I didn’t take any, just thought about it. I guess I was just feeling a little overwhelmed. I was being stupid”

‘It’s not stupid to feel overwhelmed. There’s no shame in being asked to do more than you can cope with. The only foolish thing is to not realise you need to say ‘No’ sometimes – that sometimes you need help and have to ask for it. I’ll try and make that easier for you from now on. Promise me though that you’ll not let your thoughts travel in such a dark direction again without letting me know.’

‘I’ll try not to – I promise.’

‘Excellent. Remember, we’re in this together.

Cratchit couldn’t quite believe what he was hearing and couldn’t stop himself voicing the question that was on his mind.’

‘Dr Scrooge,’ Cratchit began

‘It’s Ebenezer. Call me Ebenezer’.

Cratchit hesitated and then tried again. ‘Ebenezer.’ It seemed strange to hear the name spoken aloud, ‘I hope you don’t mind me saying this, but something seems different about you today. Has something happened?’

‘I rather think it has,’ said Scrooge. ‘As a profession we’re convinced everything’s wrong. A lot is of course, but I see now that if we can see what the problems are, then surely we stand a chance of making changes.’

‘But how?’

‘To be honest, I’m not quite sure. One thing would be our need to challenge the idea that medicine has all the answers. We need to say ‘No’ to the over medicalisation of life and be honest with both ourselves and our patients as to what we can and can’t do. Another thing would be that we have to be allowed to behave as the professionals we were trained to be. Once we were seen as people who could be trusted to make judgments in the best interests of patients. Now it seems we are seen as mere service providers, required to unquestionably follow guidelines regardless of how appropriate or otherwise that might be. It’s as if we’re not considered competent to try to decide what is best for our own individual patients. But one size doesn’t fit all. And so we need to fight to retain the doctor patient relationship that underpins good general practice and not allow it to be lost in the rush to conveyer belt medicine. We have to take back control over our work, make our own decisions as to how to apply medical knowledge to each individual situation and have the courage to resist the inappropriate demand to behave in ways that are imposed on us by government, pharmaceutical companies and society as a whole. That would mean better health for our patients and happier working lives for ourselves. That’s something I can aspire too, and knowing what it is I’m aiming for might just give me a chance of fathoming out how I might go about working towards it. At least, that’s my hope.”

Scrooge, in his excitement, had been pacing around the room. Now, pausing for breath, he sat down.

‘But that’s enough of all that for now. We can get together tomorrow and plan then just how exactly we’re going to do things differently. We’ll call it a practice away day. Just think of all the CPD hours we can claim! So, what are your plans for today?’

‘Well I had planned on a spot of revising for the CSA.’

‘Revising for the CSA. What nonsense – you’d pass that tomorrow with your eyes closed. Like it or not, you’re spending the day with me! We’ll have dinner at my house. I ordered a lorry load of food from Waitrose last week and there’s no way I can manage it all on my own. In fact there’s more than enough for two. Quick, go and get yourself sorted out. I’ve got an idea – one that might, for the first time in my career, satisfy my appraiser that my reflections have altered my practice!”

It wasn’t long before Cratchit was sat in the passenger seat of Scrooge’s car wondering where Scrooge might be taking him. A few minutes later they pulled up outside a block of flats and Scrooge led the way up the steps to the second floor. He knocked on a door.

“Who lives here?” asked Cratchit.

“Mrs Gray. She’s lived here alone since her husband, Timothy, died a few years ago. He was a short man. He had some kind of growth hormone deficiency I believe.’

Eventually, the door opened, and Mrs Gray stood there, evidently astonished to see her GP.

‘Good morning Mrs Gray. And a very merry Christmas to you.’

‘Well a very merry Christmas to you too Dr Scrooge. But what brings you here? Is it about the chocolates?’

‘Certainly not. We, that’s Dr Cratchit and I, have come to pick you up and take you off to my house for Christmas Day. What do you say? Will you come?’ Mrs Gray hesitated, uncertain if she should.

‘Please come, Mrs Gray. It would mean a lot to me’

‘But I’ve nothing to bring’.

Scrooge looked over her shoulder and saw the box of chocolates on the kitchen table. ‘What about those?’ Scrooge asked, ‘You don’t have to bring anything, but if you’d like to make a contribution…’

‘But I’m pre diabetic Dr Scrooge, I need to be careful what I eat’

‘Who told you that?’ said Scrooge, a broad grin forming on his face. ‘Not a doctor I hope. Believe me Mrs Gray, you shouldn’t believe everything we doctors tell you!’

With that, Mrs Gray tottered to the kitchen, picked up the chocolates and made her way back to the front door. Then, together with Scrooge and Cratchit, she made her way slowly down the stairs. Half way down, Scrooge stopped.

‘You go on Bob, I’ll catch you up in a moment. It’s just that I have a feeling that, as a GP, I am, for once, ideally positioned to reduce hospital admissions’

He ran back up the stairs and knocked on the door of the flat opposite that of Mrs Gray. A man opened the door.

‘I don’t want to appear interfering,’ Scrooge began, ‘but your son will develop a rash later this morning. When he does, try wiping it off with a damp cloth. Trust me, I’m a doctor!’

With that Scrooge turned and headed off back down the stairs leaving the man speechless behind him.

…………………………………

A couple of hours later, the two doctors and their elderly patient sat around a dining table enjoying Waitrose’s finest. As the meal drew to a close, Cratchit turned to Scrooge

‘I think I’ve made my decision’ he said.

‘What decision is that?’

‘I’d like to accept your offer of a partnership, if I pass the CSA that is’

‘That’s wonderful Bob, simply wonderful!’ Scrooge stood up and shook Crachit warmly by the hand and then, for the second time in the day, embraced him warmly. ‘This is excellent news – for me and for the practice. We should organise a party!’

Scrooge dashed out of the room and returned with a sheet of paper on which were listed all the practice staff, their names and telephone numbers.

‘And a party we shall have,’ declared Scrooge handing the list to Cratchit. ‘Start ringing round and invite anyone who’s free to join us here this evening. Perhaps someone will bring some of those Prosecco and pink peppercorn Pringles – are they really a thing? Only don’t let me drink too much. The last time I did that there was an incident at a local supermarket, the details of which you don’t want to know!’

‘Can I say something Dr Scrooge?’ Scrooge turned around and saw that Mrs Gray had got to her feet. With one hand she steadied herself by holding onto the table and with the other she was holding a glass of wine. ‘I’ve had a lovely time today and I want to thank you for all your kindness. I’d like to propose a toast, to both of you, the practice, and the NHS as a whole. It’s something my late husband used to say.’ She raised her glass higher. ‘God bless us, every one’, she said.

‘God bless us, every one’, repeated Scrooge and Cratchit, smiling as they raised and carefully tapped together their glasses.

…………………………………

In time, Cratchit passed his CSA and joined Scrooge in partnership. And for a while the practice prospered. Though their processes and procedures didn’t always meet with the full approval of the CQC, Scrooge and Cratchit always enjoyed the strong support of their patients. Scrooge’s experiences that night may not have changed the state of the NHS as a whole, but they did change how the NHS was manifested in one small corner of that great organisation. Scrooge became known as a doctor who cared for his patients more than he cared how he was thought of by those in power. He knew how to support others and recognised too how he himself needed the support of others. May that be truly said of us all.

And so, as Mr Gray observed, ‘God bless us, Every One!’


SCROOGE WILL BE BACK – IN ‘SCROOGE IN THE TIME OF CORONAVIRUS’

To read ‘A Tale of Two Patients’, Part 1 of that story, click here


For a complete version ‘A Primary Care Christmas Carol’, click here

Other medically related Christmas themed blogs:

To read ‘How the Grinch and Covid stole General Practices Christmas’, click here

To read ‘Twas the night before Christmas – 2020’, click here

To read ‘A Merry, and Resilient, Christmas’, click here

Other GP related stories:

To read ‘A Grimm Tale’, click here

To read ‘The Happy Practice – A Cautionary Tale’, click here

To read ‘The Three Little GPs and the Big Bad Secretary of State for Health’, click here

To read ‘A Mission Impossible’, click here

To read ‘A Bear called Paddington’, click here

To read ‘Mr Benn – the GP’, click here

To read ‘Jeeves and the Hormone Deficiency’, click here

A PRIMARY CARE CHRISTMAS CAROL – Stave Four

For Part 1, click here

For Part 2, click here

For Part 3, click here

Stave Four – in which the future appears far from bright.

Alone again, Scrooge, out of force of habit, checked his phone for notifications. No red circle had appeared in the corner of the Facebook icon to indicate that someone, somewhere cared about what was on his mind. This was not unexpected as it had been a long time since anyone had ‘liked’ him – still longer since he’d been loved. It was a surprise to him, therefore, when the phone vibrated alerting him to the arrival of a text message.

‘This is to remind you that your appointment with the Ghost of General Practice Yet To Come is scheduled for now. Please access your Babylon Wealth account and prepare to speak to somebody with no soul’

Scrooge noticed a new app had appeared on his phone’s home screen. It glowed menacingly, demanding to be tapped. Scrooge couldn’t help thinking that ‘Babylon’ was a curious name for a company to chose to call itself, recalling, as he did from his days in Sunday School, how Babylon represented all that was evil, ‘the mother of earth’s abominations’ and a ‘dwelling place for demons’. Perhaps, he concluded, it was strangely fitting after all.

Against his better judgement, Scrooge opened the application and was greeted by a disclaimer making it clear that any advice given was only valid for minor, self limiting medical conditions and any harm that resulted from Babylon clinicians failing to appreciate a more serious underlying problem was not their responsibility. Those experiencing more complex health concerns were directed to approach less forward thinking health providers. Scrooge was requested to indicate his acceptance of these conditions and, having complied, the screen gave out a burst of light and there then appeared what looked for all the world to be a businessman dressed in an executive suit.

‘Welcome to Babylon Wealth,’ the man announced. ‘where your health needs are our business opportunity’. He smiled a self-satisfied smile, which Scrooge did not find reassuring.

‘Are you the Spirit of General Practice Yet To Come?’ Scrooge enquired.

The spirit’s smile wavered a little. ‘Is that what The Ghost of Christmas Present called me? She is so yesterday. I’ve been rebranded and, from now on, I am to be known simply as ‘The Future’. Exciting isn’t it? Now, how can I profit from you?’

‘I believe you’re supposed to show me my future’

‘Yes of course, but I don’t have time to talk to you about that in any depth. So, in the interests of efficiency, I’d like to request that you utilise this corporate video feed. If you’ve any further questions you’ll be required to make a further appointment. You will receive an invoice for the services I have provided today and your account will be automatically debited the requisite amount. Thank you for using Babylon Wealth. Have a nice day.’

Lost for words, Scrooge tapped the link that had appeared on his phone and continued to gaze at the screen at what seemed to be, if such a thing was possible, a broadcast from the future. It began with an aerial view of a huge featureless building over which an audio commentary played. “Welcome to the world’s first fast health outlet. – Where health is cheap and time is short”. A notice board at the entrance of the building came into focus revealing that ‘The National Wellbeing Centre’ was open 24 hours a day, 365 days of the year. Two enormous panels straddled the entrance bearing images of the Secretary of State for Health and the President of the National Pharmaceutical Board. They were pictured smiling benignly down upon the multitude who were milling around a large reception area.

As the camera roamed around, the audio commentary explained how no appointment was necessary but that, on arrival, patients were required to utilise electronic panels positioned in the foyer to answer a series of questions by way of ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ answers only. As a result of the responses that were given, each individual would then be assigned to a wellbeing advisor. If, and only if, it was deemed necessary that face to face contact should ensue, they would then wait outside one of the 666 consulting rooms housed within the complex until their allocated interaction was scheduled. Patients were advised that only objective quantifiable, symptoms could be dealt with and that treatment options would be determined solely on the basis of the medico-economic considerations pertinent to each individual case. Reassurances were offered that a number of payment options were available.

Around the foyer, electronic panels displayed information for consumers alongside a number of company disclaimers:

“Due to many drugs now being of limited availability, if medication is advised, the sourcing of that medication is entirely the responsibility of the customer.”

“Please be assured that we respect your anonymity and consider it of paramount importance to maintain the highest levels of confidentiality. In order to guarantee this, no wellbeing advisor will consult with the same client on more than one occasion and no personal communication is permitted between clinicians. At all times, to minimise any humanising of the clinical interaction, a mask must be worn over the face.”

“The National Wellbeing Centre cannot accept responsibility”

“Strict quality control measures are in place to guarantee the optimal outcome of each clinical interaction. Each consultation is electronically monitored and any deviation from company protocols will result in disciplinary action being taken against the clinician concerned.”

The announcements seemed endless, each, it appeared to Scrooge, alienating the individual in need still further from the connection they craved with somebody who just might care enough to show a little concern. Patients were managed without any warmth or compassion – processed by a system that existed solely for the benefit the state that had created it.

As Scrooge continued to watch, the announcements kept flashing across the screens, hypnotising those whose eyes were drawn lifelessly to their incessant messages. Dehumanised, everyone became the same – And that same was nothing more than a reservoir of data.

“Please be aware that displays of emotion are not encouraged in consultations and tissues are therefore not provided in the consultation rooms.”

“Customers will not be permitted to leave the centre until the requisite post interaction forms are completed. Not only does the filling of these forms provide the essential feedback necessary to identify suboptimal clinician performance, the personal data requested allows us to identify those agencies from whom we will profit most by our facilitating their communication with you.”

“Everybody here at the National Welfare Centre wishes you, and your purchases, a very merry Consumertide.”

And then, finally, before the cycle of messages started once more, one last announcement:

“Turmeric is available from the kiosk in the foyer”

The camera returned to a view of the outside of the building and Scrooge caught a glimpse of a small panel attached to the wall next to the main entrance. He paused the video and expanded the image to take a closer look. He could just make out the words that were inscribed on the ill maintained copper plate.

‘This facility was erected on the derelict site of what was once known as a GP medical centre. Drs J. Marley and E. Scrooge worked here for many years providing a form of medical provision which today is only of historical interest. The medical centre operated with the quaint intent to provide medical care that was responsive to patient needs. Dr Marley’s untimely death left Dr Scrooge struggling as he found it impossible to replace his former partner. He continued for a time supported by a series of doctors in training, but, after a personal tragedy struck the medical centre, it was no longer considered fit to remain a training practice. Dr Scrooge continued alone for a brief time, but the pressure of working in such an inefficient manner soon proved too much and he himself succumbed to a stress related illness. Happily, his demise proved the catalyst for the development of the progressive wellbeing centre that we benefit from today.’

Scrooge could not believe what he had witnessed. It struck him that there had at no point been any mention of there being any doctors present in the running of the well-being centre. It was almost as if there was now nobody providing a professional opinion, nobody making a judgement, nobody applying a bit of wisdom and that clinical algorithms were being used to make each and every decision. Were there, he wondered, any doctors still in existence at all? Perhaps, in the future, nobody wanted to be one. The questions kept coming. Was this really the future of the health service that once, years previously, he had been so proud to be a part? What about Cratchit? What did the ‘personal tragedy’ refer to? And what of his own future? Could any of this be changed?

Scrooge tapped frantically on his phone seeking a further appointment with the Ghost of General Practice Yet To Come. Fortunately, for all the faults of Babylon Wealth, having made the appropriate additional payment, an appointment was easy to come by, and soon, the business-like figure of the spectre, who had been so brusque with him earlier, appeared on the screen once more.

‘Good Spirit’ Scrooge implored, ‘Assure me that I may yet change these shadows you have shown me by an altered life’

The spirit laughed. ‘It’ll take more than one doctor changing to alter the future of the health service. That’s the trouble with you people. Too often you think it’s all down to you’. The spirit made a poor attempt at a Clint Eastwood impersonation, ‘A doctor’s got to know his limitations.’

‘And besides, what’s your problem? What we’re doing merely reflects the ideology of the nation – that everything comes down to money. We measure and record data because data sells. What we understand at Babylon Wealth is that people are commodities. For example, we record an elevated cholesterol solely because we know there is somebody out there who is selling a product to reduce lipid levels and is willing to pay for the information we collect. We don’t care about people, only the wealth that they generate for us.’

‘But it’s not all about money’, Scrooge insisted.

‘Isn’t it?’ countered the spirit. ‘It seems to me that everyone has a price Dr Scrooge. Are you really the exception?’

‘Well maybe I do have a price, but if I have, it’s at least partly because, in recent years, with so much of the joy having been sucked out of the job, the only way that I’ve been in any way rewarded for my efforts is financially. There’s no appreciation from those who call the tune, no recognition of how difficult the job has become and nothing but constant demands that I must do better. Take appraisal – if a requirement to show year on year improvement doesn’t amount to saying that we’re not good enough as we are, I don’t know what is. Something has to change’.

‘Well good luck to you with that, Scrooge. I concede that, as a profession, challenging the status quo rather than capitulating to the spirit of the age whilst all the while laudably endeavouring to deliver its impossible demands would be a step in the right direction. But I can’t see it ever happening – you’re all too busy just trying to keep your head above water to organise a concerted campaign for change.’

‘But let me try, spirit. Let us try. I have learned my lesson well this night. Perhaps things need not turn out the way you have shown me”.

And with that, Scrooge deleted the Babylon Wealth app from his phone, never to be installed again. He got back into bed. He’d seen and heard quite enough.

For Part 5, click here


Other medically related Christmas themed blogs:

To read ‘How the Grinch and Covid stole General Practices Christmas’, click here

To read ‘Twas the night before Christmas – 2020’, click here

To read ‘A Merry, and Resilient, Christmas’, click here

Other GP related stories:

To read ‘A Grimm Tale’, click here

To read ‘The Happy Practice – A Cautionary Tale’, click here

To read ‘The Three Little GPs and the Big Bad Secretary of State for Health’, click here

To read ‘A Mission Impossible’, click here

To read ‘A Bear called Paddington’, click here

To read ‘Mr Benn – the GP’, click here

To read ‘Jeeves and the Hormone Deficiency’, click here

A PRIMARY CARE CHRISTMAS CAROL – Stave Three

For Part 1, click here

For Part 2, click here

Stave Threein which our tale takes (trigger warning) a darker turn

In the few minutes he had to think before the next ghostly visitor was due to arrive, Scrooge reflected on the events of the evening so far and wondered if he should try to claim a few hours of CPD. However, anxious as to how his appraiser might respond to such revelations and fearful that his reflections may be used against him, he concluded, as many before him, that it would be best not to put his thoughts down in writing.

He then realised that it was almost half past two. Was he not to be visited again tonight after all? But within a moment of his beginning to wonder this, he was woken from his reverie by the sound of his bedroom door bursting open and the arrival of a rather flustered looking figure entering the room. She was carrying a pile of papers in one hand whilst tapping into the mobile phone she held with the other.

‘I’m sorry to keep you waiting’, the spectre began. ‘I’ve been so busy tonight and the last chap I visited had several issues that he wanted me to provide spiritual insight on. Blow me if he didn’t have a list! Now what seems to be the problem? I am the Ghost of General Practice Present. Did you have any ideas, concerns or expectations as to how I might haunt you?’

Scrooge looked back at the apparition somewhat non-plussed. He hadn’t asked for the visit and, other than his previous encounters that night, had no experience of consulting with individuals from beyond the grave. Though highly concerned by the present turn of events and expecting to find the whole thing highly disagreeable, he had very little idea as to quite how the encounter should progress. Consequently, Scrooge said nothing.

‘Oh dear,’ said the ghost, unnerved by Scrooge’s silence, ‘This is awkward. I told Marley that there was little point in my visiting you without you being willing to see me. You see it’s so hard to help somebody unless they realise they have a problem and want to be helped.’ Still Scrooge found himself lost for words.

Rather than using the silence as a technique for therapeutic communication, the ghost laid the papers that she had been carrying down upon Scrooge’s bed and started flipping through the pages. ‘I’m sure there is a guideline for this situation somewhere. Give me a minute and I’ll be with you as soon as I find it. I don’t want to get this wrong.’ A few minutes passed, at the end of which the ghost seemed to have found what it was that she was looking for. ‘Ah yes, that’s it – come with me. I’m to show you how Christmas is being spent by others this year. Only I’m running short of time so we’ll have to make it quick’.

Once again, Scrooge was taken by the hand but, somewhat to his disappointment, she led him down the stairs in the conventional fashion before continuing through the front door and out into the night. ‘I’m afraid that these days we don’t employ the use of magic flight’, the spirit explained, ‘There’s no evidence for it, you see. It’s all evidence based hauntings these days’.

The fog had thickened making it difficult to see where they were going but the ghost still had hold of her phone and had entered the post code of their destination into Google maps. Before long they reached a block of flats and proceeded to climb the communal stairs. On the second floor, they passed through the wall into the home of a young family, the spirit assuring Scrooge as they did so, that the Celestial Institute for Ethereal Excellence had approved, in highly selected cases, what was known in the profession as quantum tunnelling, provided said cases met stringent eligibility criteria.

The flat bore witness to the fact that it was Christmas Day. The mantelpiece and sideboard were covered with Christmas cards and coloured paper chains were hanging from the ceiling. In the corner was a Christmas tree under which a three year old boy was happily making good use of the colouring set he had recently unwrapped. He stood up and walked into the kitchen where his parents were preparing dinner. They turned to him and noticed that he was covered in red spots. Immediately his mother emptied the pint glass of Prosecco she was drinking and used it to perform the ‘tumbler test’, her anxiety being heightened all the more when the rash failed to disappear. She pressed the speed dial button on her phone and called ‘111’.

‘I’m worried about my son – he’s covered in spots’ she exclaimed to the call handler. ‘No – he seems well in himself…No – no vomiting or fever…No – no headache or tummy pain…No – no catastrophic loss of blood and No – he has just the one head’. The list of negatives continued until the questioner focused in on the rash. ‘Well it’s almost as if he’s been marking himself with a red felt tip pen!’ The women listened to the call handler for a few moments longer before ending the call.

‘What did they say?’ her partner asked.

‘Something about a non-blanching rash being possible meningitis and that it’s better to be safe than sorry. They’re sending an ambulance.’

‘Bloomin’ right too. Now let me refill your glass, we can’t have you sober when it arrives!’

The Ghost of Christmas Present indicated to Scrooge that it was time to move on. Their next stop was just across the stairwell. Passing once more through the walls of the property, Scrooge recognised Mrs Gray, the frail elderly lady who lived there, as one of his patients. She was nearing the end of her life due to her having advanced metastatic disease. A single Christmas card lay face down on the dining room table, alongside of which was a box of chocolates she had bought for herself in an attempt to make Christmas Day, the fifth she’d have spent alone since the death of her husband, at least a little special. She knew it would be her last. As Scrooge looked on, the woman picked up the chocolates and shuffled slowly across the room and then, for want of anyone else to give them to, placed them in the kitchen bin.

‘What’s she doing?’ Scrooge asked the spirit.

‘She doesn’t think you’d approve if she ate them’ replied the ghost, who then proceeded to point to a letter held to the fridge door by a magnet commemorating the Queen’s Silver Jubilee. It was from Scrooge’s medical practice informing her that her recent routine blood tests had revealed that she had a slightly elevated HBA1c and that she was therefore classified as ‘pre diabetic’. Included with the letter was a leaflet giving helpful advice on healthy eating.

Scrooge stood staring at the woman. He realised that, though if asked to relay the ins and outs of all her most recent blood tests he would have been up to the task, in recent years at least, he’d not really known her at all.

The spirit had left the flat and Scrooge hurried to catch her up. They walked together without talking until they came to a house that Scrooge had never visited before. Here they stopped and stood outside the window of a dimly lit room. Peering in through the poorly drawn curtains they could see the figure of Bob Cratchit. He was sat, his head in his hands, surrounded by various medical text books. To his left was a half empty bottle of scotch and a packet of antidepressants. He was writing a note.

Scrooge turned to the Ghost of General Practice. ‘What’s he doing?’ he asked.

‘Struggling’ she replied.

‘But why? He’s such a good doctor’.

‘He is indeed. But he doesn’t know it. He has come to believe that he has to be perfect – that every guideline must be followed and a failure to do so will result in legal action being taken against him. He’s taken on the burden that comes from believing that medicine has the answer to every problem experienced by a broken society. He thinks it’s all down to him. He has been worn down by the constant demand from both society and the profession that he must perform better – that good enough is not good enough. He’s exhausted by the never ending assessment of his performance and crushed by the weight of the responsibility he feels. He lives in the constant fear that it’ll all be his fault if anything bad ever happens. He too feels all alone this Christmas.’

‘But this afternoon? He asked to leave early to spend some time with his family’

‘Indeed he did but the truth is that he hasn’t much in the way of a family – just a couple of friends he thinks of as family. In reality he had hoped to meet those friends for a drink but things didn’t quite work out the way they were planned. When he left the surgery late yesterday he went back to check on one of the patients he’d visited. Their condition had deteriorated and he arranged an admission but he was left feeling guilty and anxious. As a result he didn’t think he’d make very good company. And besides, he was worried about his CSA exam and thought the time would be better spent preparing for that.’

‘But he’ll pass the exam easily’ Scrooge exclaimed. ‘He’s come on leaps and bounds since that unfortunate misunderstanding the first time round. The patients love him – and the staff. He’ll make a great GP’.

‘Have you ever told him that?’

Scrooge fell silent. Perhaps he could have been a bit more supportive, encouraged a little more. Perhaps he could have helped him steer a course through the mass of expectation and enabled him to distinguish between what was genuinely important and what could appropriately be ignored. Perhaps he could have been the kind of trainer Fezziwig had been to him – one who, despite the changes enforced on the profession, could still see the joy of working in general practice and convey a little of that to the next generation – one who would fight for what was worth fighting for rather than retreating into cynicism, bitterness, and resentment.

‘I never knew he felt so alone. I never knew he was finding it so hard.’

‘Did you ever ask?’

Scrooge’s head fell. ‘Can I speak to him now?’

‘I’m afraid not. He won’t be able hear you, and what’s more our time is up. We must go.’

‘But I must do something’

‘That’s as maybe – but you have another appointment to keep. You must meet the Ghost of General Practice Yet To Come.’

The ghost started back towards Scrooge’s home. Scrooge himself lingered a little longer at the window in the hope that Cratchit would see him and appreciate his concern. Finally he turned his back on the scene and trudged slowly after the ghost who was now some yards ahead of him. Behind him, Cratchit slipped silently into the deepest of deep sleeps.

The spirit accompanied Scrooge back to his room but, before she left, she had one small request.

‘I’d be most grateful if you could fill in this form by way of giving feedback on my performance this evening. And it would be very helpful if you could indicate whether you’d feel able to recommend me to your friends and family…’

Regretting the choice of words even as she spoke them, an awkward silence arose between them. The spirit looked at Scrooge – Scrooge looked back

‘…or perhaps just an acquaintance…a passer by even?’

Sensing that now was clearly not the time, the Spirit said a hurried goodbye and left, leaving Scrooge alone with his thoughts. He couldn’t stop thinking about what he’d seen. He tried to convince himself it was all a dream, that none of it was real. Had things really become this bad? And could the future be worse? He had a feeling he was about to find out.

For Part 4, click here


Other medically related Christmas themed blogs:

To read ‘How the Grinch and Covid stole General Practices Christmas’, click here

To read ‘Twas the night before Christmas – 2020’, click here

To read ‘A Merry, and Resilient, Christmas’, click here

Other GP related stories:

To read ‘A Grimm Tale’, click here

To read ‘The Happy Practice – A Cautionary Tale’, click here

To read ‘The Three Little GPs and the Big Bad Secretary of State for Health’, click here

To read ‘A Mission Impossible’, click here

To read ‘A Bear called Paddington’, click here

To read ‘Mr Benn – the GP’, click here

To read ‘Jeeves and the Hormone Deficiency’, click here

A PRIMARY CARE CHRISTMAS CAROL – Stave Two

For Part 1, click here

Stave Twoin which Scrooge fondly remembers

Dr Scrooge woke in a cold sweat and sat bolt upright in his bed. This was not unusual for, in recent weeks, the stress associated with an impending visit by the CQC had frequently disturbed his sleep. Moments later, however, his thoughts were diverted from the need to get on and write those mandatory protocols on the secure overnight storage of hand towels and the safe use of the stairs, when, at one o’clock precisely, his bedroom door creaked open and a strange looking fellow crept into the room. Over a woollen cardigan he wore a tweed jacket complete with leather patches on the elbows; on the end of his nose was perched a pair of pince nez glasses; and in his hand he carried a battered black Gladstone bag.

‘Are you the spirit, sir, whose coming was foretold me?” asked Scrooge.

‘Indeed I am’ the apparition replied. ‘I am the Ghost of General Practice Past. I’ve come straight from a meeting of my celestial Balint Group. And my, what catharsis we enjoyed there this evening. Your former partner, Jacob, was in attendance. He’s a good chap, a jolly fine fellow. But enough of that. Come along with me – he has sent me to show you what General Practice once was.’

The spirit held out his hand and Scrooge instinctively took it. As he did so, Scrooge felt himself being lifted, as if weightless, from his bed. The spirit led him to, and then through, the wall of the bedroom and out into the night air. They journeyed until they found themselves in the oak panelled surroundings of what appeared to be a gentleman’s club. A number of elderly men sat together in high backed leather chairs. All were doctors, enjoying a glass of port after a drug sponsored Christmas meal. With them was a medical student who was attached to one of their number.

‘Listen to these chaps’, the spirit said to Ebenezer, ‘Each and every one is a fine fellow – a jolly good chap. You could learn a thing or two from what decent sorts like these have to say.’

The men were taking it in turns in regaling the medical student with tales of their working life.

‘Of course, these days, the youngsters have it easy. They only work a mere seventy two hours a week you know. In my day it was eighty one’

‘Eighty one hours? You had it easy. It was all internal cover when I did my house jobs. In real terms, I did a hundred hours a week’

‘Only a hundred hours a week? Luxury. I was running a GP practice single handedly by the time I was 23.. On call every hour of every day.’

‘That’s right. We had it tough as GPs. One hundred and sixty eight hours a week we worked – and, of course, we had to provide all the obstetric care – home deliveries every day’

‘And most of those were C.Sections – we had do the operations with only kitchen utensils for surgical instruments and a bottle of brandy for an anaesthetic’

‘Aye – and if you tell that to the medical students of today, they’ll not believe you.’

The spirit indicated that it was time to move on and Ebenezer readily agreed. He’d heard it all before. The walls of the room blurred and faded and gradually, as things came back into focus, Scrooge realised that they were now high above rolling hills. Passing over snow covered fields and lanes, they travelled until they came at last to a small town and stopped by a house that Scrooge recognised as his childhood home. Outside the dwelling, a car pulled up. The familiar figure of his family GP clambered out of the vehicle and made her way up the garden path to the front door. A woman was waiting anxiously for her arrival. They exchanged a warm greeting after which the woman led the doctor up the stairs to a room in which a boy lay, pale and in obvious distress.

‘Thank you for coming doctor, I know you’re busy but I didn’t know what to do. Ebenezer’s usually such a healthy child but he seems now to be struggling with his breathing.’

‘It’s no trouble Mrs Scrooge – let’s take a look at him.’

The doctor knelt down by the bedside and smiled at the boy who managed to smile weakly back. Ebenezer liked the doctor. He’d visited her a number of times over the years but this was the first time she’d ever visited him. The doctor asked a few questions and then carefully examined the boy, paying particularly careful attention to his chest. When she was done, she turned back to his mother and gave her the diagnosis.

‘I’m afraid it looks like we’ve a case of pneumonia on our hands. He’s really quite poorly and will be needing the help of my colleagues at the hospital. We best get him there as soon as possible.’

Scrooge looked on and wondered how she could say such a thing without a computer and a pulse oximeter to enable her to assess the risk of sepsis. She hadn’t appeared to even consider a CURB-65 score. None the less, a few phone calls were made and the doctor, placing her hand on Mrs Scrooge’s shoulder as if to say that everything would be alright, made her goodbyes,having given an assurance that an ambulance would soon arrive, an expectation Scrooge thought fanciful in the extreme,

‘Do you remember that day Ebenezer?’ asked the Ghost of General Practice Past.

‘I do,’ Ebenezer whispered, taken aback at how emotional he was now feeling. The spirit smiled to himself as he sensed that Scrooge was close to tears. He loved catharsis – catharsis was good. ‘She was such a lovely doctor’, Scrooge continued. ‘Always so kind and reassuring. She’d become almost a part of the family having visited so frequently during the last days of my father’ final illness. She always seemed to have time. It was because of her that I decided to become a doctor. The way she practiced medicine caused me to realised that being a doctor was a wonderful job to have. She seemed to me to be a fortunate woman.”

‘A fortunate woman indeed’ agreed the spirit. ‘A fortunate women and…’ he paused, thrown for a moment, ‘…a good chap’. The spirit hesitated again and then added, as if to try and reassure himself, ‘She was a jolly fine fellow.’

With that the ghost again took Scrooge’s hand and soon they were once more travelling through the night sky. On and on they flew, until they came to a village hall decorated brightly with all manner of coloured lights. A Christmas tree strewn with tinsel and still more lights stood by the entrance. Inside, Scrooge recognised the staff of his GP training practice. Some talked, others laughed and a number danced enthusiastically to music provided by a band. All were clearly enjoying the opportunity to relax and have fun together. A portly man then stood up and called for a bit of hush. It was Dr Fezziwig, the senior partner of the practice and Ebenezer’s one time trainer.

‘A moment’s silence if you please everybody. If I might say a few words, thank you all so much for coming this evening. I hope you’re having a good time.’ He paused a moment and then, with a feigned suggestion of doubt in his voice, questioned the crowd, ‘You are having a good time, aren’t you?’ Those gathered gave the desired response with cheers and roars that left nobody in any doubt that indeed they were. Fezziwig continued. ‘I want to thank you all for your help this past year. The partners appreciate your hard work, doing what can be a very difficult job. We couldn’t manage without you.’ More cheers followed together with a few calls for a pay rise. Fezziwig then concluded by wishing everyone a very Merry Christmas and insisting that everyone took advantage of the free bar that he and the partners were glad to provide. ‘Only keep an eye on young Dr Scrooge. He’s a fine young doctor but Ebenezer’s not as experienced as we older GPs and I’m not sure he can take his drink! We don’t want a repeat of last months incident when he woke up naked on the delicatessen counter at Sainsbury’s!’

‘Now HE does seem like a good chap – a jolly fine fellow’ declared the spirit, beaming as if the natural order had been restored to where chaos had once threatened to reign. ‘He’s a good, fine, decent, jolly chap of a fellowy sort if ever I saw one.’

The Ghost of General Practice Past turned to Scrooge and looked him straight in the eye. ‘But what of him?’ the spirit asked drawing his companion’s attention to a young man who was accepting the gentle ribbing at the hands of the senior colleague he respected so highly. He was sat laughing alongside various members of staff with whom he was sharing a table.

‘I was so happy then’ Scrooge told the ghost. ‘He was such a wise man and so willing to share what he had learnt. And we were such a great team, all so eager to support one another. Back then, there seemed to be so much more time. Why did everything change? And how did I become so resentful of the job I used to love?’

‘Something certainly changed – something that shouldn’t have’ replied the ghost. ‘At least, not in the way it has. Perhaps something needs to change again. Perhaps something needs to be recovered. But it is for you to decide what and how. As for me, my time is up. We must return. You have other guests to welcome tonight.’

And in less time than it takes for EMIS to crash on a busy Monday morning, Scrooge was back in his room, alone with his thoughts. It was nearly two in the morning.

TO BE CONTINUED

To read Part 3, click here


Other medically related Christmas themed blogs:

To read ‘How the Grinch and Covid stole General Practices Christmas’, click here

To read ‘Twas the night before Christmas – 2020’, click here

To read ‘A Merry, and Resilient, Christmas’, click here

Other GP related stories:

To read ‘A Grimm Tale’, click here

To read ‘The Happy Practice – A Cautionary Tale’, click here

To read ‘The Three Little GPs and the Big Bad Secretary of State for Health’, click here

To read ‘A Mission Impossible’, click here

To read ‘A Bear called Paddington’, click here

To read ‘Mr Benn – the GP’, click here

To read ‘Jeeves and the Hormone Deficiency’, click here

A PRIMARY CARE CHRISTMAS CAROL – Stave One

Stave Onein which Scrooge reveals just how burnt out he really is.

Old Dr Marley was dead. As dead as the NHS would be within a couple of years if things didn’t start to improve soon. And, as far as Dr Ebenezer Scrooge was concerned, Jacob Marley was better off out of it. Scrooge and Marley had been long term partners and Scrooge greatly missed his former colleague who had died several years earlier. This was not the result of any affection he had had for the man, that was not in Scrooge’s nature, but rather on account of the fact that, due to the national shortage of GPs, he had been unable to find a replacement, and his workload had consequently increased beyond the point of being manageable.

It was Christmas Eve and Scrooge was sat at the desk in his consulting room. It was nearly three in the afternoon. Morning surgery had only just finished and this was now what was laughably called his ‘lunch break’. An email flashed up on his computer screen. It was from the CCG wishing him a merry Christmas.

‘Bah!’ muttered Scrooge to himself. ‘Humbug! If they really wanted my Christmas to be merry, then perhaps they and NHS England could have agreed that I didn’t have to make up the Advanced Access hours, lost from not opening the surgery on Christmas Day, later in the week. Every idiot’, he continued, ‘who goes about with ‘Merry Christmas’ on his lips should be submitted to unnecessary colonoscopic examination and be forced to reflect on the experience for the purposes of revalidation.’

Dr Scrooge was not one to enjoy Christmas, and being encouraged to be merry served only to darken his already black mood still further. The situation was not helped by the arrival of a receptionist who announced her presence with a knock on his already open door.

‘Sorry to trouble you Dr Scrooge, but the Salvation Army band are playing Christmas carols in the car park and are asking if you would like to make a donation.’ She handed him a leaflet informing him that this Christmas many people would not have anywhere to sleep due to the lack of hospital beds resulting from years of chronic NHS underfunding. Scrooge sighed – this was nothing he didn’t already know. Only that morning he had been asked to arrange a review over the holiday period of a patient that was about to be discharged, a little earlier than was ideal, from the local, desperately overworked, hospital. Though he regretted being unable to promise that level of care, his refusal then had been unequivocal and he was no more minded now, at his own personal expense, to start financially propping up a system left destitute by the establishment. As far as he was concerned, he was already paying quite enough tax and, given that he had just learnt that the security of his pension was now somewhat precarious, he felt it was unlikely that he would change his mind on the matter. He stood up and slammed the door in his informant’s face. Sensibly, the receptionist interpreted that as a ‘No’ and scuttled back to where her colleagues were celebrating Christmas with a box of mince pies and a tube of Prosecco and pink peppercorn Pringles – the latter, notwithstanding the alliteration, surely an ill advised flavour choice, regardless of the season.

Scrooge had been invited to share in the festivities but he had no desire to do so. Nor did he have time. Instead he returned to his computer screen and started the never ending task of clearing his inbox of lab results, hospital letters, and prescription requests. He’d barely started when there was another knock at the door. Scrooge barked out a ‘What is it?’ and the door swung open to reveal the ST3 who had been with the practice since August. Dr Robert Cratchit was a highly capable doctor though one who lacked confidence in his own ability. To Scooge’s dismay he was wearing a Christmas jumper.

‘What do you want? Can’t you see I’m busy?

These words were not unfamiliar to Dr Cratchit, who, over the previous five months, had heard them frequently from the man who purported to be his trainer. In fact, so frequently had he heard them that, for a time, he had used them to start all consultations with patients, imagining them to be the profession’s approved opening words for all doctor/patient interactions. A failed attempt at the CSA and the associated considerable expense of applying to sit the exam again had indeed taught him much. Familiarity however did not make it any easier for Dr Cratchit to approach a man who never offered advice without showing contempt for the one who asked for it. For although Scrooge had received training on giving feedback, he had, much to the dismay of his appraiser, consistently failed to demonstrate any change in his behaviour as a result of such practice improving activity.

‘I was j-just wondering if it would be convenient if I were to g-go’ Cratchit stammered. ‘I’m only supposed to do one clinical session today and, though the planned patch t-tutorial for this afternoon has been cancelled, I thought that, since you allocated me all the visits, you m-might let me skip off a little early this afternoon. It is Christmas after all and I would so appreciate having the extra time to be with m-my family.’

Scrooge glowered. ‘Of course it’s not convenient. And I don’t suppose you’ll be offering to work a couple of extra Saturday mornings in lieu of the day you’ll no doubt be taking off tomorrow. That’s the trouble with young doctors these days. No commitment’

The ST3 smiled faintly and waited nervously. ‘Go on then, leave’ Scrooge eventually conceded, ‘But if anything goes amiss this afternoon and I’m compelled to reflect on some significant event or another, I know where my reflections will lay the blame. Just make sure you’re in early on Thursday.’ Cratchit thanked Scrooge and slipped away, leaving the burnt out old clinician alone with his thoughts and the prospect of a three hour afternoon surgery.

As things turned out the rest of the day was mercifully quiet with Christmas Eve being the one afternoon of the year which provided the general population with something more interesting to do than seek medical advice regarding their minor health concerns. As a result, Scrooge locked up the practice early and arrived home before nine. He’d stopped on the way to pick up a bite to eat but, having consumed it en route, the only thing he had to look forward to on arriving back was, as most evenings, the prospect of going to bed.

As he got out of his car, a fog hung about the driveway of the old house, that he’d bought some years before. Scrooge approached the front door, the fog seeming to cling to him as he walked. It was then that he noticed, in place of the ancient door knocker, what was clearly the face of his old partner, Dr Marley. The apparition lasted but a moment before Scrooge, unsettled by the sighting, hurried on, unlocking the door and subsequently forcing a pile of unsolicited medical periodicals to one side as he entered the house. He locked the door behind him and climbed the stairs to his bedroom.

Scrooge undressed and put on his night attire. As he sat gazing into the middle distance, contemplating once more the strange appearance of the door knocker, there came an unexpected ringing sound that filled him with inexplicable dread. Scrooge scrambled in his pocket for his phone. However, as the caller’s number was withheld, he, as was his custom, ignored what was almost certainly a nuisance call and continued his preparations for bed. And then he saw it. A sight that caused him to be more horrified than he’d ever been before – even more horrified than that morning when his appointments had included seven heart sink patients and three more complaining of being ‘Tired all the time’. Before him, as unwelcome as critical emails from the head of Medicines Management, stood the ghost of Dr Jacob Marley.

Scrooge, nothing if not a man of reason, rose up and spoke to the spectre in an accusatory tone.

‘I don’t believe in you’ he said.

‘You don’t believe in most NICE guidelines and yet they exist’ countered the phantom.

‘That’s true’, Scrooge was forced to concede and with that he sat back down in his chair. He paused a moment then, looking the ghost full in the face and acknowledging his existence, asked the reason for his visit.

‘I have come to warn you Ebenezer. There is yet a chance that you may escape what has become my fate. I am condemned to walk the earth for all eternity burdened by these chains – chains composed of nonsensical bureaucratic demands imposed on me by those who understand nothing of medicine and seek to use the profession for their own political ends. You have forgotten, Ebenezer, what being a doctor is really all about. You have forgotten the joy that your work once brought you and now you practice as a mere shadow of the clinician you once longed to be. You’re burnt out Ebenezer. Something needs to change.’

‘Blimey!’ said Scrooge, ‘like that’s going to happen’.

‘You will be haunted by three spirits,’ continued the ghost, ignoring Scrooge’s cynicism. ‘They will teach you all that you need to know. Without them you cannot hope to shun the path I now tread. Expect the first when the clock strikes one’.

And with that the ghost of Jacob Marley departed, groaning incoherent sounds of lamentation and dragging the weight of his chains behind him. Scrooge stood motionless for he knew not how long. Then, mindful of his need for rest, he climbed into bed. Picking up a copy of the BJGP, he fell asleep upon an instant.

TO BE CONTINUED…

To read Part 2, click here


Other medically related Christmas themed blogs:

To read ‘How the Grinch and Covid stole General Practices Christmas’, click here

To read ‘Twas the night before Christmas – 2020’, click here

To read ‘A Merry, and Resilient, Christmas’, click here

Other GP related stories:

To read ‘A Grimm Tale’, click here

To read ‘The Happy Practice – A Cautionary Tale’, click here

To read ‘The Three Little GPs and the Big Bad Secretary of State for Health’, click here

To read ‘A Mission Impossible’, click here

To read ‘A Bear called Paddington’, click here

To read ‘Mr Benn – the GP’, click here

To read ‘Jeeves and the Hormone Deficiency’, click here

Dark Reflections

Three reflections on observations made on dark early morning journeys into work:

Firstly – Sat Navs can cause confusion.

One morning, not too long ago, I was confused when my Sat Nav, suddenly added 18 minutes to my expected journey time to work. I couldn’t discern why and so concluded that I must have entered a time warp and that my understanding of the space-time continuum would need rethinking. Later I realised it was simply that I had set the Sat Nav for home. My confusion had resulted from setting an inappropriate goal and then paying too much attention to what the IT was saying.

It seems to me we are in danger of doing the same in medicine. It’s been remarked on before that computers were once our servants but that we have now become their slaves. We have set our destination as ‘perfect health’, believing that medical knowledge and technological advance could deliver just that. Though an unrealistic goal, it is one our political masters, and much of society, continue to demand.  The result is that too many of us in the NHS are confused – feeling overwhelmed, disillusioned and unhappy. Burdened with striving for the perfection the system demands and forgetting that not everything deemed urgent is important, we find ourselves constantly responding to messages that tell us we are deviating from our course and that somehow we are not up to scratch. And worst of all, as we chase the measurable targets that are demanded of us we are in danger of missing the unmeasurable, but immeasurably more important, needs of the patient in front of us. Sickness and suffering are, regrettably, part of life. Though we should try to alleviate it, believing it can be eradicated, we lose our capacity to tolerate any form of difficulty. And so, every day normal inconveniences become worthy of an urgent consultation – ‘Acne? The duty doctor will see you now’.

Medicine harms – not only by way of drug side effects and surgical complications but also by creating health anxiety and promoting dissatisfaction with one’s lot by colluding with the idea that what is normal is unacceptable. Furthermore the constant pressure to deliver perfect medical practice is harmful for us as doctors – an insistence that all must be done perfectly – every guideline followed, every problem solved, every demand met – will lead to a generation of guilt ridden doctors who are paralysed by the fear of doing it ‘wrong’. No wonder it has been reported that about 50% of doctors presenting in difficulty to support services are GPs and 50% of those are aged 29-32. We need to continue to look after each other.

So how to solve the problems of the NHS?  Easy. We just need to reset the Sat Nav – and decide on some other place to go than ‘perfect health’. I’m absolutely certain there are better places to visit – I just doubt whether society will be able to agree on where that place might be.

Second observation – Mobile phones are presumptuous.

Not long after getting my new phone, it thoughtfully informed me, as I climbed into my car one morning, that the journey to my practice would take 29 minutes. At first I found it a little unnerving to think it knew where I was going. But later I realised it was simply being presumptuous. I say presumptuous because travelling around in my pocket for a few weeks did not give it the right to think it knew me. OK it got lucky that particular morning – and a number of mornings since if I’m honest – but, believe it or not, it takes more than a few weeks to know who I am.

I am closing in on 23 years as a partner at my practice  and one of the great things about working in one place for as long as that is that you get to know people – and people get to know you – rather better than a jumped up piece of electronics can over a couple of weeks. This is true in relation to the patients on one’s list – and is why we must continue to resist any pressure to give up the concept of personal lists. Patients are all extraordinary complex and if we are to be in any position to be remotely helpful to them then we need to understand them better than is possible from a cursory acquaintance. But just as significant perhaps as how well we know, and are known by, our patients is how well we know, and are known, by those with whom we work. We too are all extraordinary complex – unfathomable even. I truly value the constancy that I have known at my practice over these past many years. To feel one has a place and that one is accepted – despite ones many limitations – is immensely reassuring – particularly in a job such as ours where we deal with so much uncertainty – both in terms of the problems that are presented to us and the insecurities that we feel within ourselves – or at least I feel within myself. Of the eight partner practice I became a part of, though three partners joined, only one retired in the first 18 years I was with the practice. Our practice manager started at the same time as me and some of the members of nursing and admin teams predate me. More recently, four partners have retired in the last four year. They were such a part of the practice that they are still genuinely missed – somehow something seems to be missing.

Now that’s not to make the seven excellent new doctors we have appointed in recent years feel uncomfortable. The practice has been a place of constancy for a big chunk of my life but, at the same time, never unchanging. I am absolutely delighted to have each of the new partners with me – all are already friends as well as colleagues – and I look forward over the next 8-10 years (maybe) continuing to get to know and be known by them better. I very much hope they will feel as supported and at home as I have these past couple of decades.

GP Practices are important. Because resilience doesn’t just come from within. It comes from without too – from the support and encouragement provided by those one can lean on when times are hard and who, in the event of you falling, can be relied upon to pick you back up again when you haven’t the strength to do it yourself.

On a personal level, recent years have not always been easy. Frequently it’s all felt too much. Now I’m fully aware that others – both within those who will read this and amongst our patients – have far worse difficulties to face than I do – but inevitably my own problems often dominate my thoughts. I’ve lived long enough now to realise that, as I’ve already suggested, nobody escapes suffering – it’s true for our patients, it’s true for our families and, of course, it’s true for each one of us. It is part of what makes up a life. But at such times it’s good to be amongst a bunch of people with whom one can be weak and know that, even if they can’t fix it for you, they none the less care. Which is, I suppose, a large part of what being a doctor – indeed a large part of what being human – is about. I am hugely grateful to those I have blubbed down the phone to on a Sunday evening, to those who have offered to cover if I ever wanted to leave work and take some time, and those who have simply known and shown concern over the years. I have often thought that happiness has got less to do with what you do in life, and rather more to do with who you do it with. I’m glad to have done whatever I have done with the people I have. I don’t see that changing.

And lastly and ever so quickly – the third thing I’ve noticed on my way to work. The sunrise is sometimes staggeringly beautiful. There have been a few glorious ones. It is good to get a little perspective by looking outward at something more impressive than oneself. Not only is it more satisfying to admire the admirable than to be admired, it’s good to be reminded that, after a period of darkness, the sun eventually rises. ‘Weeping may tarry for the night, but joy comes with the morning’.


To read ‘Reflections in the Darkness’, a more theological version of this blog, click here

‘The Medical Condition’ or ‘Hannah Arendt is completely fine’

Why have so many of us become so dissatisfied with our working lives?

Why have so many of us become so dissatisfied with our lives in general?

Hannah Arendt (1906-1975) was a German born philosopher best known for ‘The Human Condition’ (1958). In it, if I understand her correctly, she explains her view that the way out of living a meaningless life is to bring about change through our ability to act and thus create something new. She distinguishes our ‘actions’ from our ‘labour’ and our ‘work’. ‘Labour’, to Arendt, is simply those activities of living by which we meet our biological needs whereas ‘work’ she defines as that which we do within the world that imparts a ‘measure of permanence and durability upon the futility of mortal life and the fleeting character of human time’. ‘Work’ produces something abiding and is of a higher level than ‘labour’ which merely perpetuates. Our ‘actions’, however, are what really count. It is not so much ‘what’ we are that matters but rather ‘who‘ we are and who we are is best revealed through our words and deeds – when we go beyond our inherent selfish survival instincts and ‘act’ to bring something new and unexpected into existence.

Two key behaviours that Arendt identifies as bringing about this change are those of forgiveness and the making and keeping of promises. Forgiveness is the behaviour by which it is possible to nullify past actions, releasing others from what they have done and enabling them to change their minds and start again. ‘Forgiveness‘, she writes, ‘is the key to action and freedom‘ and ‘the only way to reverse the irreversible flow of history‘. In contrast, our ability to make and keep promises marks us out as being able to make the future different from the past. ‘Promises are the uniquely human way of ordering the future, making it predictable and reliable to the extent that this is humanly possible‘.

Arendt believes that, to be fulfilled, we need to be able to act in ways that advance or better society as a whole. And herein lies the clue as to why some of us may have lost satisfaction in our working lives and, perhaps, our lives as a whole.

Though we continue to seek happiness, so restricted have we become in public life, by the guidelines that we have to adhere to and the hoops through which we have to jump, that we have become like slaves who have no prospect of having genuine influence. In Arendt’s terms, we can ‘labour’ and ‘work’ – but we can not ‘act’. Furthermore, having given up the prospect of doing something that might bring about real change and produce genuine benefit, we have retreated from the public sphere and been reduced to consumers who are content to amuse ourselves in private – with yet another bottle of prosecco, perhaps, and an evening spent bingeing on the latest Netflix box set.

Arendt suggests that ‘under conditions of tyranny, it is far easier to act than to think‘. Such then is the consequence of a too heavy, top down, approach to medicine when conformity to guidelines is all. In such circumstances, we seek only to unquestioningly comply with what we are told we must do and, from fear of reprisal, we anxiously seek to do so perfectly. But, says Arendt, ‘In order to go on living one must try to escape the death involved in perfectionism‘. By giving up the hope of genuine autonomous action we have given up our hope of fulfilment and with it our hope of happiness.

Thoughtlessly striving for perfect compliance, we therefore die.

This links into another idea of Arendt – that whilst we can know much about the objective world, we fail to understand what lies beneath the surface – that which is most important. ‘What’ we are is our body, but ‘who’ we are is disclosed by our words and deeds. As doctors we may know a lot about ‘what’ our patients are – the details of their individual biological parameters – but we struggle to know ‘who’ they are – their true nature as revealed by what they say and what they do. We can only know ‘who’ our patients are by devoting more time to watching them, listening to them and learning what makes them who they are. We need to spend more time with people, both our patients and those friends and relations whom we love the most, not only for the emotional and material support they provide but also, Arendt believes, for the joy of seeing them reveal their true character.

Failure to know our patients therefore diminishes our working lives. We all risk burning out if we are concerned only about ‘what’ our patients are rather than ‘who’ they are and who they may become. But this becomes harder as workload increases, remote consulting increases and personal lists become fractured. These and a million other concerns press in on us and prevent us from taking the time necessary for us to know our patients.

Finally then, what of ourselves. Arendt suggests that we may never really know who we are ourselves because that is something that can only really be observed by others, those who see us act in ways that we can not see ourselves. This is most true when we love – for love, she says, reveals ‘who’ we are like nothing else simply because it is unconcerned with the ‘what’ of the one we love. ‘Love, by reason of its passion, destroys the in-between which relates us to and separates us from others

To regain our satisfaction with work, therefore, we need to change. We need to stop behaving in the way that we have been encouraged to practice, stop seeing the ‘what’ of patients and, instead, notice the ‘who’ that they are. In short we need to care for our patients.

We need to stop judging them for their past mistakes, forgiving their unhealthy habits, and thereby giving them the opportunity to start again. We need to give them the hope they need in order to begin again and so create something new in their lives. And we need to believe that patients really can change and promise them the help and support they need to avoid remaining stuck as they are.

If we act in these considered, creative and unexpected ways we really will make a difference – a difference that will also restore our own satisfaction in practicing. We must be more than simply service providers, performing our jobs according to protocol. We need to tackle head on the problems of life and think for ourselves. Because to live is not to merely survive, mindlessly comply and contentedly be entertained. The provision of ‘bread and circuses‘ is not enough for us to be happy. Rather, to truly live is to be somebody who acts and brings about the change, the new start, we all so hope for and so very much need if we are to keep on keeping on.

Eleanor Oliphant, the eponymous hero in Gail Honeyman’s novel captures the sense of this well.

“I suppose one of the reasons we’re all able to exist for our allotted span in this green and blue vale of tears is that there is always, however remote it seems, the possibility of change”.


Related blogs begin with one on the dangers of perfectionism:

To read ‘Professor Ian Aird’ – A Time to Die?’, click here

To read ‘On Not Remotely Caring’, click here

To read ‘Contactless’, click here

To read ‘Vaccinating to remain susceptible’, click here

To read ‘On Approaching One’s Sell By Date’, click here

To read ‘Eleanor Rigby is not at all fine’, click here

To read ‘General Practice – still a sweet sorrow’, click here

To read ‘We had the experience but missed the meaning’, click here

To read ‘On keeping what we dare not lose’, click here

To read ‘When good enough isn’t good enough’ click here

To read ‘It’s alright ma (I’m on GPing)’, click here

To read ‘My back pages’, click here

To read ‘Vanity Fair’, click here

And now one on the dangers of perfectionism:

To read ‘Professor Ian Aird’ – A Time to Die?’, click here

And finally a trilogy on the subject of burnout:

To read ‘Somewhere over the Rainbow’, click here

To read ‘When the Jokes on You’, click here

To read ‘With great power…’, click here

It’s alright, Ma (I’m only GPing)

Not so long ago, a school uniform committee was set up at the local educational establishment frequented by my children. Predictably enough, though nobody seemed to have a problem with the previously requisite attire, before long, presumably to justify their own existence, changes started being made and additional expense was forced on parents who had to spend money they would rather not, simply to satisfy the desire of those imposing the new requirements.

Immanuel Kant, the great German philosopher of the seventeenth century, once said, ‘The possession of power invariably debases the free judgement of reason’ or as William Pitt the Elder put it in a speech in 1770, ‘Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it.’ Those with power think differently because of that power and do so in a way that tends to favour their own ends rather than those of others.

This is a problem – and not only because of the cost I incurred kitting out my children. There are those who have power over us in the world of medicine, the government, the CQC and various regulatory bodies to name but three. If Kant is right, inevitably that power will serve them more than it serves us. But before we join the revolution and line our masters up against the wall, there are some things we should consider. Firstly we should think about the nature of the authority held by those who make the rules. We make a mistake if we think we should necessarily be the final arbiters of what should be done and how. It would be arrogant to think we know everything and do not need guidance from those with greater expertise. But equally we should be slow to comply with the instructions of those who impose their will but have yet to demonstrate that they have the requisite wisdom and knowledge for their authority to be accepted. Stanley Milgram’s carried out experiments in the 1960’s, in which he found subjects were, contrary to their conscience, prepared to administer potentially life threatening electric shocks to people when instructed to do so by someone in authority, even when those they were shocking had supposed heart conditions and were begging for them to stop. Such experiments demonstrate how prone we are to obey authority figures.

So we need to keep our minds switched on and think critically about what we are being asked to do. The way we practice should not be as a consequence of a mindless desire to satisfy the guidance with which we have been issued. If we are nothing more than protocol following service providers it will make us bitter and complaining, resistant but not resilient – there is a difference. Bob Dylan had it right when he sang of how ‘the masters make the rules, for the wise men and the fools’ and that those ‘who must obey authority that they do not respect in any degree…despise their jobs, their destinies’ and end up doing ‘just to be nothing more than something they invest in’

We need to be different. We need to be professionals who enjoy their work despite the stress because we know that the work is meaningful. We will be humble enough to follow advice and guidance from those we trust but when we do it will not be simply so we can be suitably compliant but because we see it as the best way to achieve the desired end – the best for our patients.

Because as Kant also said, rational human beings should be treated as an end in themselves and not as a means to something else. Which brings us to another important consideration. We have power over our patients. Milgram’s experiments also demonstrated how carefully power must be wielded . And so we must ask how often do we use our power in such a way to serve our best interests rather than the best interests of our patients? How often do we steer our patients to make decisions that make our life easier? How often do we use them as a way to make us feel good about ourselves?

Of course GPs are human and therefore subject to the same limitations that this brings on everybody else, but we should be mindful of how we may be prone to act and take steps to counter this unhelpful tendency. For me this is one reason why personally I want to remain a GP and not be called something that some might consider more honourable. I acknowledge that there may be benefits in our being known as a Consultant in Family Medicine in terms of patients recognising the degree of our training and expertise, it certainly sounds more lofty, but, for me, it distances me from the patient I am seeking to help. I don’t want to be in this job for status – I need to stay grounded, maintain a little humility. The title GP is certainly a more down to earth title, but it is, as a consequence, one which, as well as making us more approachable to patients, helpful, I think, in limiting the power we may be tempted to feel and which is liable to be used, at least by me, a little too much to my own ends.

In short, and I know this may be controversial, I’m happy to be ‘just a GP’.

Hoping to maintain resilience

If there is one thing that is common to all patients that consult us, it is that they want things to be better for them than they currently are. They would like us to do or say something that would ease their pain, relieve their anxiety, alleviate their distress. They want us to change their future because their present is not to their liking. If on leaving our rooms they already feel better, it is simply because they have been given some hope that things will improve.

Hope. Patients need it – doctors and nurses need it – I need it. Hope keeps us going in the face of problems which seem insurmountable. Like Seligman’s dogs, who in his experiments on ‘learned helplessness’ were put in adverse situations they couldn’t change, without hope we become resigned to never ending difficulty and tend towards depression and passivity.

Jurgen Moltmann writes, “Present and future, experience and hope, stand in contradiction to each other”. He suggests that “hope is directed to what is not yet visible… and brands the visible realm of present experience…as a transient reality that is to be left behind”.

Some are uncomfortable with our constantly living in the hope of a better tomorrow. They suggest we spend either too much time living in the past, remembering what was, but is no longer; or too much time living in the future, hoping for that which is not yet. Bemoaning such behaviour, Blaise Pascal wrote “We do not rest satisfied with the present. We anticipate the future as too slow coming, as if in order to hasten its course; or recall the past, to stop its too rapid flight…We scarcely ever think of the present; and if we think of it, it is only to take light from it to arrange the future…So we never live, but we hope to live; and as we are always preparing to be happy, it is inevitable we should never be so.”

Pascal would, I think, have approved of mindfulness, the psychological process of bringing ones attention to experiences occurring in the present moment. Now, whilst mindfulness may have its place when we are overwhelmed by unnecessary anxiety concerning the future, grounding us, as it does, in the here and now and helping us appreciate what we have and can currently enjoy, if we imagine we can sort our patients’ very real problems by advising that they consider the intricacies of a tree, then surely we are mistaken. T.S.Eliot penned, “The knowledge derived from experience…imposes a pattern, and falsifies”. What we know from what we encounter is not enough to understand fully. We need to draw from outside of ourselves if we are not to be misled. The present requires the context given it by the past and is tempered by what is expected in the future. A powerful illustration of this is provided by John Piper. He asks us to imagine that, whilst walking through a hospital, we hear the screams of somebody in pain. He suggests that how we feel about what we hear will differ greatly depending on whether we are on an oncology ward or a labour ward. The future matters – it changes our present.

As health care professionals, we are in the business of changing the future for our patients – offering a promise of a better tomorrow for those with whom we consult. We seek to envisage what currently can’t be seen and then endeavour to bring it into reality for them. Moltmann again: “Hope’s statements of promise…stand in contradiction to the reality which can at present be experienced. They do not result from experiences, but are the condition for the possibility of new experiences. They do not seek to illuminate the reality which exists, but the reality that is coming.” So, for example, when we issue a prescription for pivmecillinam, it is the proffering of a hope, that the cystitis will come to an end. It’s a promise that what is not true now, will shortly be so.

But changing the future is an act worthy of the divine. Nonetheless, having too often in the past arrogantly acted as if we were God, increasingly, it seems, it’s now being demanded of us. And our attempts to satisfy that overwhelming demand is dragging us under because, of course, not all hopes can be so simply realised by the prescribing of a course of antibiotics. Furthermore, we can strive all we like to live in the moment but, as temporal creatures, we cannot escape the future. Not least, we cannot deny that we are cognisant of our own mortality. Death is a problem we all have to face and one which medicine, despite its best efforts, still can’t solve. To quote Moltmann once more, “The pain of despair surely lies in the fact that a hope is there – but no way opens up towards its fulfilment”. What then can we do when faced with the problem of death. Must we, if we are to carry on at all, agree with L.M. Montgomery that ‘life is a perfect graveyard of buried hopes’? Should we, with Dylan Thomas, “rage, rage against the dying of the light” or comfort ourselves with mere mindfulness as we “go gentle into that good night”.

Death is the one thing we can be certain of and yet, desperate that that were not so, too often we mindfully focus our attention on the detail of the here and now of our patients’ clinical parameters in an attempt to pursue and push eternal life. Not only is this unhelpful for patients weighed down by a medical profession too scared to address its own limitations, it’s also bad for doctors who are burdened with the Sisyphean task of delivering the undeliverable.

Regardless of what we may or may not believe about what happens after death, what is certain is that everlasting life is not a gift that is ours to give. We, and our patients, need to stop pretending otherwise.. If we’re not to make an almighty mistake, we need to stop playing God and acknowledge our remarkable ordinariness, the ocean of our ignorance and, what Atul Gawande calls, our ‘necessary fallibility’. We may not be the answer our patients are looking for.

But death is not the only future problem our patients face that medicine cannot solve. Many of our patients have lost hope of things ever being better – the future is something only to be feared. We live in an increasingly anxiety ridden society. Henry Thoreau wrote “The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation, and go to the grave with the song still in them.” But Thoreau was wrong – the desperation is deafening.

Many of us will also know what it is to have a difficulty which appears beyond us, which wears us down and threatens both our present happiness and the happiness we desire for tomorrow. If then we are to solve the problem of the future, we must either limit its’ importance and be content to be satisfied by the joy of the present, or struggle to find the antidote to despair that is the hope of something better. There is much that medicine can do but we must not imagine that it is the only thing in which we or our patients should hope. Often that hope would be better placed elsewhere – after all, a misplaced hope is a false hope, and a false hope is no hope at all. We, and our patients, need to be directed towards a real hope that can lift us above the suffering of the here and now, something we can look forward to and which, despite everything, will keep us going; something which, even if it can’t get us to the top of the mountain we face, manages to draw us up a little higher and puts us in a place where we are able to at least imagine what the view from the top might look like.

When life is hard, whether at work or elsewhere, we all want things to be better – it’s then, more than ever, that we need a hope for the future to keep us keeping on, The exact nature of that hope will be different for each one of us. For some, the hope will sometimes be but modest – indeed when life is at its hardest, modest may be all we can muster. For others, or at other times, the hope may be more extravagant – transcendent even. But big or small, dependent on us or others, we need a hope that sustains us.

Despite our difficulties, we must make room for hope

We need to search it out knowing that, though we may not find it medicine or ourselves, there is always hope to be found.

And when it seems there isn’t, we need to hope against hope, that hope somehow finds us. Because, even then, though not, perhaps, in a form we once expected, a hope that does not give up still remains.


Related blogs:

To read ‘Hope comes from believing the promises of God’, click here.

‘Ah, but I was so much older then, I’m younger than that now.’

As a boy, I spent my early years playing. I did not seek to please anyone as I played, though my parents no doubt were pleased to see me doing what all children ought. I did not seek to play better than those I played with – what would be the point? I simply played, and was glad to do so.

Then came school and, though I did not seek to impress, I was, from time to time, rewarded. Stars for pleasing the teacher. And I saw that the number of stars others received was compared with those that were bestowed on me. I was, I realised, in competition with my peers.

School continued and the tasks set me became more complex – the rewards more contingent on my reaching a certain standard. ‘Work hard’, they said, ‘and you might do well – you might progress’. There was always a next stage, never a point beyond which one could stop and rest. And so to university – where those who strived hardest won the best jobs.

And so at last came work. And the rewards dried up, replaced now by the threat of sanctions. Instead of rewards for achieving, now there were punishments – even for those who were simply standing still. Good enough was no longer good enough. ‘Be better, Do more’, they said, ‘You must do better. You must do more’.

So harder and harder i worked until I stopped – exhausted – defeated..

‘Ah, but I was so much older then, I’m younger than that now.’

I remembered my years as a boy. When I just did what I wanted, did what was right for me to do.

Competing in a misguided attempt to prove our perfection makes losers of us all.

And so I became a child again – became wise again – just enjoying doing what I was meant to do.

Perhaps there are those who are glad to see me now – doing what I do. But if not, so be it.

The doing is reward enough.

****

To read an updated version of this blog entitled ‘My Back Pages’, click here

Be Drunk – extended Theological version

How about impressing your appraiser with this as one of your goals for personal development in the coming year. ‘Be drunk’.

Charles Baudelaire (1821 – 1867) wrote:

You have to be always drunk. That’s all there is to it – it’s the only way. So as not to feel the horrible burden of time that breaks your back and bends you to the earth, you have to be continually drunk.

But on what? Wine, poetry or virtue, as you wish. But be drunk”

I know this because yesterday morning, having dealt with his chronic cough, a patient quoted the above to me – in the original French. He also plays jazz professionally and in the past has, on occasions, performed with Acker Bilk. How cool is that?

The poem goes on:

And if sometimes, on the steps of a palace or the green grass of a ditch, in the mournful solitude of your room, you wake again, drunkenness already diminishing or gone, ask the wind, the wave, the star, the bird, the clock, everything that is flying, everything that is groaning, everything that is rolling, everything that is singing, everything that is speaking. . .ask what time it is and wind, wave, star, bird, clock will answer you: “It is time to be drunk! So as not to be the martyred slaves of time, be drunk, be continually drunk! On wine, on poetry or on virtue as you wish.”

I suspect many of us have woken again this week, ‘in the mournful solitude’ of our consulting rooms, stone cold sober as a consequence of having had the cold water of another day on the front line thrown in our face. Baudelaire tells us that to avoid being the ‘martyred slaves of time’ the only way is to be intoxicated by something good that consumes us. Many of us will have an interest outside of work that does this for us but what if, in addition, it were possible to be continually drunk on our practice of medicine?

Currently this is far from easy, given the way we are forced to practice. Rather than losing ourselves in our work, delighting in it, we are forced to be too self aware – having as we are to constantly justify ourselves. Have you ever thought how the system inherently criticises us.? Our constant need to demonstrate improvements in our practice implies that we are never considered to be good enough whilst our endless need to gather feedback is a system of policing employed by those who can not bring themselves to trust us.

Medicine, like life itself, is a team game in which we all play our part. Highlighting individual weaknesses rather than emphasising team strengths is like a lion isolating the injured in a herd of antelope and going in for the kill. Together we can survive, leaning on our colleagues in both primary and secondary care even as we allow them to lean on us.

How does the poem go? ‘If a child lives with criticism, he learns to condemn’. Is it any different for doctors? Is it any wonder that sometimes we are a little condemning, a little bitter, a little negative? But if instead we lived with encouragement, might we not learn to be a little more confident, if we lived with approval, might we not learn to like ourselves a bit more, (something too many of us struggle with), and if we lived with acceptance, might we not learn again to love what we do. And wouldn’t that make us better, more caring, doctors?

So let’s get drunk this weekend on whatever it is that does it for us but don’t forget that, leaving aside the nonsense, being a GP remains a worthwhile endeavour. Yes it could be better but it still has the capacity to be both wonderfully enjoyable and genuinely satisfying. Of course we’re not perfect, it’s an impossible job, but regardless of what some might say, remember that, as we frequently say to our patients by way of encouragement, together we are ‘good enough’.

Stick that knowledge in your hip flask and sip from it frequently this coming week.

********************

Charles Baudelaire got something very right in his poem ‘Be drunk’. He felt the need for something to which one can give one’s life, something by which one can transcend the ‘horrible burden of time’. But he also got something very wrong. His suggestions as to what that thing might be, wine, poetry or even virtue, can never satisfy for more than a moment. He should have looked elsewhere for that. And so must we.

It is not wrong though to want to be happy – nor is it wrong to want that happiness to last for eternity.

C.S. Lewis has it right when he said,

“Creatures are not born with desires unless satisfaction for those desires exists. A baby feels hunger: well, there is such a thing as food. A duckling wants to swim: well, there is such a thing as water. Men feel sexual desire: well, there is such a thing as sex. If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world. If none of my earthly pleasures satisfy it, that does not prove that the universe is a fraud. Probably earthly pleasures were never meant to satisfy it, but only to arouse it, to suggest the real thing. If that is so, I must take care, on the one hand, never to despise, or be unthankful for, these earthly blessings, and on the other, never to mistake them for the something else of which they are only a kind of copy, or echo, or mirage. I must keep alive in myself the desire for my true country, which I shall not find until after death; I must never let it get snowed under or turned aside; I must make it the main object of life to press on to that other country and to help others do the same.”

We were, then, created to be happy – our desire for happiness proves that this is the case. The psalmist knew it too and what is more he knew where to find the happiness he was created to enjoy. And so he cries out to God.

‘You make known to me the path of life; in your presence there is fullness of joy; at your right hand are pleasures forevermore.’ (Psalm 16:11)

You want infinite happiness? You’ll find it in the presence of God – there you will find ‘fullness of joy’. You want eternal happiness? That too is found in God – at his right hand are ‘pleasures forevermore’.

To delight in God is to honour him and it is, therefore, far from wrong to want to be eternally happy.The evil comes from seeking our happiness in the wrong places.

‘Be appalled, O heavens, at this; be shocked, be utterly desolate, declares the LORD, for my people have committed two evils: they have forsaken me, the fountain of living waters, and hewed out cisterns for themselves, broken cisterns that can hold no water.’ (Jeremiah 2:12-13)

God is the fountain of living water, the source of all our satisfaction. It is evil not to go to him for this all encompassing joy. And it is evil, as well as utterly foolish, to seek our satisfaction in anything else since everything else is but a broken cistern in comparison to the fountain of living water that is God.

Baudelaire once wrote:

“I can barely conceive of a type of beauty in which there is no melancholy”

For this life he was right – nothing in this life is not in some way or another tarnished by the fall and even the most perfect of experiences are tempered by the knowledge that they will end. Therein lies the melancholy. But Baudelaire neglected to look beyond this world, to the God that transcends all that we see and experience – the God who is both good and everlasting. We can never fully know happiness until we fully know God. As C.S. Lewis put it:

“God cannot give us a happiness and peace apart from Himself, because it is not there. There is no such thing”

The gospel assures us though that to know God is to have eternal life and that through the redemption that has been, is being, and will be attained through the life death and resurrection of Jesus Christ we will one day have this experience for ourselves. Not yet though,

‘For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known.’ (1 Corinthians 13:12)

On that day, however, we will know a joy that at present we do not have the capacity to fully conceive. Then, as Baudelaire might have put it we will be drunk on God. Then there will be no ‘horrible burden of time’, no melancholy, but rather all of eternity to rejoice in the glory of the one whom we will eternally delight to praise.

T.S. Eliot, Jesus and the Paradox of the Christian Life.

WE HAD THE EXPERIENCE BUT MISSED THE MEANING

A while back I read ‘Histories’ by Sam Gugliani – It’s a very good read relating the stories of various individuals, clinical and non clinical, who work in a hospital, and gives their differing perspectives of what takes place there. To give you a flavour, here are a few quotes that stood out for me and got me thinking.

“Hospital words spun like stones across the still waters of people’s lives.”

“We’re all victims, aren’t we, of medicine’s success.”, and

“Their voices change key when they speak to him, lengthening to a sing-song, as if his dying might be rendered in nursery rhymes.”

And then there was, “We had the experience but missed the meaning”. Those more literate than I will know without resorting to an internet search that it is a line from the third of T.S. Eliot’s ‘Four Quartets’ entitled ‘The Dry Salvages”. It has been on my mind since discovering this remarkable, if perhaps bleak, poem.

Drawing on a 2010 blog by Ben Myers which helped me understand the poem, Eliot seems to be saying that ‘as one becomes older’ our pasts reveal, if we will see it, a pattern in which moments of ‘sudden illumination’, those times when we are happy, are the temporary exception to the norm. They are like a ‘ragged rock in the restless waters’ which serve only to reveal that the true nature of our existence is one in which permanency is characterised by abiding ‘moments of agony’ – such is ‘the primitive terror’.

“And the ragged rock in the restless waters,

Waves wash over it, fogs conceal it;

On a halcyon day it is merely a monument,

In navigable weather it is always a seamark

To lay a course by: but in the somber season

Or the sudden fury, is what it always was”

Eliot describes ‘Time’ as both our ‘destroyer’ and our ‘preserver’. The only thing that keeps us alive is the very thing that brings about our demise. Eliot is urging us to see this deeper truth that our moments of happiness display. We have these experiences, he says, but are want to miss their meaning.

So what do I take from this as a doctor? Like moments of happiness, health is but temporary. In due course normality will be restored and we will all succumb to the ravages of time. It will ultimately destroy us. I don’t mean that we should resign ourselves to a life of melancholic anticipation of death, but we should, I think, appreciate health for what it is – a state of being that we should value whilst we have it. Furthermore, as doctors, we should be realistic in terms of what we can expect to achieve for our patients. We are, after all, only doctors. We should make every effort to tend the sick and whenever possible endeavour to effect a cure. But just as important perhaps is how we encourage our patients to value their health as the fragile state it truly is and we would also do well to consider how we might prepare them for the inevitability of death. Colluding with patients that with the right combination of pills, and sufficient attention to lifestyle, death will be avoided is dishonest and, perhaps, detrimental to all our chances of enjoying the life that we have.

To continue on a more positive note, it should be remembered that ‘The Dry Salvages’ is but the third of Eliot’s ‘The Four Quartets’. The fourth, ‘Little Gidding‘ offers us some hope of redemption. Ironically perhaps, the reader is asked to reflect on their experience of what they have read earlier and understand that they may indeed have missed the meaning. There is redemption but it is a redemption not from, but through death.

“What we call the beginning is often the end

And to make an end is to make a beginning.

The end is where we start from…

We shall not cease from exploration

And the end of all our exploring

Will be to arrive where we started

And know the place for the first time.”

Similarly then, might we, and our patients, know happiness, not by the avoidance of all sadness but rather through experiencing sorrow in all its dreadful intensity? Too often I make the mistake of thinking that I can only be happy when I’m not sad, and so, when unhappiness steals its inevitable way into my life, I am left feeling that I can no longer know what it is to be happy. Foolishly, before allowing myself to smile again, I insist on striving to put an end to everything that reduces me to tears, on endeavouring to put everything right. But I simply cannot do it. Whilst I hope for that time when all will be well, waiting until then before being happy only succeeds in leaving me a long time sad. But, seemingly contradictory, happiness and sadness are not mutually exclusive. In some sense we cannot know what happiness really is without knowing the pain of sorrow – and sorrow requires the memory of the temporary nature of happiness.

To be truly happy then we cannot deny sadness – on the contrary we must embrace it. And we must learn that it is possible to know what it is to be ‘sorrowful yet always rejoicing’. It is not that we can not be happy because we know sadness, nor that we can not be sad because there are things to be happy about. Paradoxically, we can be happy and sad at the same time.

As Leonard Cohen sang, shortly before his death, ‘There is a lullaby for suffering and a paradox to blame’.

Understand this and we, and our patients, may experience life without missing its meaning.

******************

T.S. Eliot professed a Christian faith, converting to Anglicanism in 1927 and served as a warden at his local parish church of St. Stephen’s, Gloucester Road, London. The question arises then as to whether Eliot’s bleak view of a life, a life characterised by inherent sadness, all be it with the hope of redemption, is in contradiction to the joy that the Bible teaches results from the receiving of the gospel. As with much in the Christian life there is a tension here, but the simultaneous experience of joy and sadness is better described as a paradox, one experienced by the apostle Paul himself who wrote of how he was ‘sorrowful, yet always rejoicing’ (2 Corinthians 6:10). Furthermore, Eliot’s line ‘We had the experience but missed the meaning’ is one that might have been used by Jesus himself.

John 6 recounts the feeding of the 5000. The following day the people come to Jesus again only to be rebuked by him when he said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you are seeking me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves” (John 6:26). ‘You had the experience of eating the bread’, Jesus is saying, ‘but missed the meaning of what it meant to be fed’. So what was the meaning? Undoubtedly the miracle was a sign and, as with all signs, what they point too is more important than the sign itself. Nobody on a trip to the seaside, sees a sign to the beach and stops and admires the sign rather than hurrying on to play in the sand. The miracle of the feeding of the 5000 points to who Jesus is. By miraculously feeding so many people, Jesus is recreating God’s miraculous provision for the Israelites in the wilderness when he daily provided them with manna from heaven. In so doing Jesus is declaring himself to be God.

But if Eliot is right then perhaps there is more here to be learnt. Just as the experience of moments of happiness are meant to display our abiding sadness, might not the experience of being fed be meant to reveal our enduring hunger. Jesus’ words urging the people not to work for ‘the food that perishes’ suggests this might indeed be the case. Being fed with bread one day leaves you hungry the next, even when that bread is miraculously provided by Jesus. Hunger is the default position. As far as we know, Jesus did not feed the people when they came to him this second time. Instead he tells the people to work ‘for the food that endues to eternal life’ which, he says, will be given them by ‘the Son of Man’ (John 6:27).

Jesus then famously declares that he is ‘the bread of life’ and that ‘whoever comes to him shall not hunger’. Here is redemption – an end to all hunger – a redemption secured by looking on the Son and believing on him – a redemption that is all of the God whose work it is that we should believe in the one that he has sent. (John 6:29).

To have the experience of being temporary fed with physical bread and miss the meaning it points to of our perpetual hunger is to miss seeing our need for redemption by feeding on the everlastingly satisfying bread of heaven. That would be a disaster. I think Eliot is saying something similar. Our moments of happiness are meant to point to our permanent sadness and our need for a redemption which will secure an eternal joy.

Though perhaps more common than it once was, not many of us in our comfortable middle class churches, know what it means to be genuinely hungry. But we do know what it is to be genuinely sick and genuinely have problems that leave us sad. Frequently, and very appropriately, we come to Jesus on account of these things to seek his help. Now, just as he fed the 5000, Jesus also healed many people, but in the same way that the relief of the people’s hunger was only temporary, so too the physical healings that Jesus performed were not permanent. Just as the people he fed returned to him hungry the following day, so those he healed all eventually became sick again. Even Lazarus, the one who Jesus raised from the dead, in time knew what it was to become ill once more and ultimately die a second time. And so I wonder if sometimes, just as he rebuked the people for coming to him for food, for their physical needs, Jesus might, when all we are concerned about is our health, sometimes rebuke us for our constant requests for healing.

This is not to say we shouldn’t pray for healing, the Bible clearly gives us warrant for doing so, but we must be careful that we don’t use Jesus as a spiritual circus pony who must perform tricks at our bidding. Might he not sometimes say to us, ‘Truly, truly, I say to you, you are seeking me, not because you saw signs, but because you want a healing’? Might he not urge us sometimes to work, not for the healing that perishes, but the healing that endures to eternal life? If so, when we are not healed the way we would like, when our problems are not resolved the way we would chose, just as the people were not fed the way they would have liked the day after the feeding of the 5000, might we be encouraged that the reason for this is that Jesus wants us to have something better than physical healing?

Might he want us not to have had the experience but miss the meaning?

Our moments of health are but temporary and we should treasure them. But we must also see in them the meaning of our permanent sickness and our need for an eternal healing. Those who look on Jesus, who believe in him, will not spiritually die for, not only is Jesus the bread of life, he is also the resurrection and the life. The idea that health is an aberrant exception to disease, mirroring Eliot’s suggestion that happiness is an aberrant exception to a life of unhappiness, has support from scripture. 2 Corinthians 4:16 reminds us that ‘our outer self is wasting away’. For our bodies to fail is the norm. Lately I met somebody who assured me that I would soon be out of a job on account of ‘a new wave of the Spirit’ that would, in this present age, see an end to all disease. Similarly we may have dreams of ‘making poverty history’ in the here and now but Jesus said we would always have the poor with us (John 12:8) – I suspect he could have also said we will always have the sad and the sick. But taking those words that speak of our outer self wasting away in context we again have a paradox, for it is by that wasting away that our inner self is being renewed day by day. It is this suffering, this ‘light and momentary affliction’ that is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory, beyond all comparison’. (2 Corinthians 4:17). And ‘so we do not lose heart’.

Temporarily being fed should remind us of our perpetual hunger and our need for spiritual food.

Temporarily being healthy should remind us of our perpetual sickness and our need for spiritual healing.

Temporarily being happy should remind us of our perpetual sadness and our need for spiritual joy.

All of which we find in Jesus.

So yes we are hungry, yet always feeding, we are sick yet always being healed, and we are sorrowful yet always rejoicing. Such is the Christian life, not a contradiction but a mysterious and wonderful paradox. It is not that we can not be happy because we know sadness, nor that we can not be sad because there are things to be happy about. Rather we can be simultaneously happy and sad. It is a paradox, not a contradiction. We may see in our lives hunger, sickness and unhappiness, things that sometimes may be ordained for our good by our loving Heavenly Father in order that we might ‘look not to the things that are seen, but to the things that are unseen’ namely spiritual food, life and joy. ‘For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal’ (2 Corinthians 4:18).

We all experience health and happiness. When we do we must not have the experience but miss the meaning. And so too, when we suffer and are sad, as well as recognising how the longing for happiness whispers of the happiness that exists somewhere for us, we must experience too the knowledge that there is meaning in that suffering and sadness. We can rejoice when we are sorrowful and we can give thanks in every circumstance, for we have been, are being and will be redeemed – from sorrow, through sorrow, from suffering, through suffering and from death, through death.


Other poem related blogs:

For thoughts on ‘The Windhover’ by Gerard Manley Hopkins, click here

For thoughts on ‘Be Drunk’ by Charles Baudelaire, click here

Other suffering related blogs:

To read “Suffering- A Personal View”, click here.

To read “Why do bad things happen to good people – a tentative suggestion”, click here

To read “Luther and the global pandemic – on becoming a theologian of the cross”, click here

To read ‘Good Friday 2022’, click here

Other related blogs:

To read “Easter Sunday – 2021”, click here

To read ‘I’ll miss this when I’m gone – extended theological version’, click here

To read “Hope comes from believing the promises of God”, click here

To read, ‘But this I know’, click here

To read ‘Rest Assured’, click here

To read ‘The “Already” and the “Not Yet”’, click here

To read ‘Real Power’, click here

WE HAD THE EXPERIENCE BUT MISSED THE MEANING – Short Version

Recently I read ‘Histories’ by Sam Gugliani – It’s a very good read relating the stories of various individuals, clinical and non clinical, who work in a hospital, and gives their differing perspectives of what takes place there. To give you a flavour, here are a couple of quotes that stood out for me and […]

A while back I read ‘Histories’ by Sam Gugliani – It’s a very good read relating the stories of various individuals, clinical and non clinical, who work in a hospital, and gives their differing perspectives of what takes place there. To give you a flavour, here are a couple of quotes that stood out for me and got me thinking.

“Hospital words spun like stones across the still waters of people’s lives.”

“We’re all victims, aren’t we, of medicine’s success.”, and

“Their voices change key when they speak to him, lengthening to a sing-song, as if his dying might be rendered in nursery rhymes.”

And then there was, “We had the experience but missed the meaning”. Those more literate than I will know without resorting to an internet search that it is a line from the third of T.S. Eliot’s ‘Four Quartets’ entitled ‘The Dry Salvages”. It has been on my mind since discovering this remarkable, if perhaps bleak, poem.

Drawing on a 2010 blog by Ben Myers which helped me understand the poem, Eliot seems to be saying that ‘as one becomes older’ our pasts reveal, if we will see it, a pattern in which moments of ‘sudden illumination’, those times when we are happy, are the temporary exception to the norm. They are like a ‘ragged rock in the restless waters’ which serve only to reveal that the true nature of our existence is one in which permanency is characterised by abiding ‘moments of agony’ – such is ‘the primitive terror’.

‘And the ragged rock in the restless waters,

Waves wash over it, fogs conceal it;

On a halcyon day it is merely a monument,

In navigable weather it is always a seamark

To lay a course by: but in the somber season

Or the sudden fury, is what it always was’

Eliot describes Time as both our ‘destroyer’ and our ‘preserver’. The only thing that keeps us alive is the very thing that brings about our demise. Eliot is urging us to see this deeper truth that our moments of happiness display. We have these experiences, he says, but are want to miss their meaning.

So what do I take from this as a doctor? Like moments of happiness, health is but temporary. In due course normality will be restored and we will all succumb to the ravages of time. It will ultimately destroy us. I don’t mean that we should resign ourselves to a life of melancholic anticipation of death, but we should, I think, appreciate health for what it is – a state of being that we should value whilst we have it. Furthermore, as doctors, we should be realistic in terms of what we can expect to achieve for our patients. We are, after all, only doctors. We should make every effort to tend the sick and whenever possible endeavour to effect a cure, but just as important perhaps is how we encourage our patients to value their health as the fragile state it truly is and we would do well to consider also how we might prepare them for the inevitability of death. Colluding with patients that with the right combination of pills and sufficient attention to lifestyle death will be avoided is dishonest and, perhaps, detrimental to all our chances of enjoying the life we have.

To end on a more positive note, it should be remembered that ‘The Dry Salvages’ is but the third of Eliot’s ‘The Four Quartets’. The fourth, ‘Little Gidding‘ offers us some hope of redemption. Ironically perhaps, the reader is asked to reflect on their experience of what they have read earlier and understand that they may indeed have missed the meaning. There is redemption but it is a redemption not from, but through death.

“What we call the beginning is often the end

And to make an end is to make a beginning.

The end is where we start from…

We shall not cease from exploration

And the end of all our exploring

Will be to arrive where we started

And know the place for the first time.”

Similarly then, might we, and our patients, know happiness, not by the avoidance of all sadness, all difficulty, but rather through experiencing hardship and sorrow in all its dreadful intensity? Too often I make the mistake of thinking that I can only be happy when I’m not sad, and so, when unhappiness steals its inevitable way into my life, I am left feeling that I can no longer know what it is to be happy. Foolishly, before allowing myself to smile again, I insist on striving to put an end to everything that reduces me to tears, on endeavouring to put everything right. But I simply cannot do it. Whilst I hope for that time when all will be well, waiting until then before being happy only succeeds in leaving me a long time sad. But, seemingly contradictory, happiness and sadness are not mutually exclusive. In some sense we cannot know what happiness really is without knowing the pain of sorrow – and sorrow requires the memory of the temporary nature of happiness.

To be truly happy then we cannot deny sadness – on the contrary we must embrace it. And we must learn that it is possible to know what it is to be ‘sorrowful yet always rejoicing’. It is not that we can not be happy because we know sadness, nor that we can not be sad because there are things to be happy about. Paradoxically, we can be happy and sad at the same time.

As Leonard Cohen sang, shortly before his death, ‘There is a lullaby for suffering and a paradox to blame’.

We may have to be patient but even on the darkest nights there is the hope that there will be other better, brighter days. Days made all the more enjoyable for having known the sadness that preceded them.

Understand this and we, and our patients, may experience life – without missing its meaning.


To read an extended, more theologically minded, version of this blog, one which considers whether Eliot’s view of life is consistent with the Christian faith he professed, click here

Other related blogs:

To read ‘The Life I Lead’, click here

To read ‘General Practice – a sweet sorrow’, click here

To read ‘Eleanor Rigby is not at all fine’, click here

To read ‘The Medical Condition or Hannah Arendt is Completely Fine’, click here.

To read ‘I’ll miss this when I’m gone’, click here

To read ‘Dark Reflections’, click here

And finally, to read some thoughts on a couple of other other poems, click either on ‘The Windhover’ by Gerald Manley Hopkins, or ‘Be Drunk’ by Charles Baudelaire.

Vanity Fair

General Practice – The story so far:

Last week many of us tried to satisfy our appraisers by proving that we had met their unilaterally determined and arbitrarily applied indicators of satisfactory professional development.

Others, under politically motivated advanced access arrangements, endeavoured to deliver a government agenda by offering patients appointments at times they did not want to be seen.

Some of us spent hours preparing the evidence to convince CQC inspectors, in frequently nonsensical ways, that our practice was safe and responsive to the needs of our patients.

And all of us tried to deliver those alleged markers of good clinical care so beloved of QoF all the while forgetting that all too often they rely on merely measuring the measurable rather than the meaningful.

Welcome to 21st century general practice – a world where, like Vanity Fair, everybody is striving for what’s not worth having.

This week, let’s remember the answer we gave when we were asked at our medical school interview why we wanted to do medicine. None of us said ‘Hit targets’ – a singularly dull and, ironically, all too often, pointless pursuit. We may have been naive, but we meant it when we answered ‘To help people’.

Sense and Sensitivity

It is a truth universally acknowledged that fast and cheap won’t be good.

Because good things take time to mature – they come about slowly. Be it a fine wine, a meaningful relationship or a wise medical opinion.

It is for good reason that basic medical education is five years in the making compared to the more normal three years of most degree courses – there is simply more that has to be considered. And even then it is for good reason that the fresh faced F1 walks onto the ward on their first day as a doctor with a degree of trepidation. They know that for all their acquired knowledge they still lack the years of experience that will see that knowledge mature into wisdom.

We live in confused times. We know that good things come to those that wait and criticise those who insist on instant gratification and yet we seek to provide instant access to routine medical care. We acknowledge that you get what you pay for but seek to deliver that most precious of things, an excellent national health service, on the cheap. Replacing expensive clinicians with an over reliance on cheap algorithms, we have removed the need for wisdom in the provision of medical decision making by imagining that the best course of action can be determined by a series of black and white questions that accept only ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ answers. This kind of ‘thoughtless’ closed questioning is just the sort that is rightly so frowned upon by medical educators.

And the results aren’t pretty. A&E departments are overcrowded and ambulance services fail to meet their target times. Genuinely sick patients wait too long for assistance whilst medical helplines send frontline emergency vehicles to hot children with rashes, young men with atypical chest pain and, my personal favourite, a young women who, on successive days, answered ‘Yes’ to a question asking if her abdominal pain was ‘tearing’ resulting in the computer program repeatedly being unable to exclude a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. We all know that certain symptoms may suggest serious pathology, but without the appliance of a degree of clinical acumen these relatively rare conditions will be considered as real possibilities far more than is appropriate.

Too afraid to be wrong we neglect to be wise enough to be right.

At medical school we were taught to consider the sensitivity and specificity of medical tests. A good test was both highly sensitive – able to identify the vast majority of true positive cases – and highly specific – able to exclude the vast majority of true negative cases. But with the currently employed ‘out of hours’ algorithms this seems to have been forgotten with the price being that to spot every case of meningitis an ambulance is sent to a thousand spotty viraemic children often despite the protestations of the parents whose own clinical judgement exceeds that of the no doubt expertly produced protocols. Only seeking advice, they themselves appreciate the inappropriateness of such an over the top response.

The same could be said of the guidelines used to instigate two week wait referrals. Not content with a specificity of 5% for these ‘tests’ for cancer, the drive is to reduce the specificity such that just 3% of referrals actually yield a positive cancer diagnosis. We would not accept a test with such a low specificity in any other situation. Surely we can do better with the application of a little bit of wisdom and thereby stop demanding that increasingly overstretched cancer services ‘process’ more and more people in an NHS which is having to rely more and more on substandard conveyer belt medicine.

Such unconsidered medicine is not good. And though at the point of delivery it may be relatively cheap, the longer term costs are not. An instant, cost cutting, NHS driven by protocol and consumer demand is resulting in an over investigated, dehumanised patient population being managed rather than cared for by a burnt out, dehumanised NHS workforce who are demanded to deliver targets rather than encouraged to offer compassion. That is a price we cannot afford.

Fast and cheap care will not be good – unlike well funded, considered, care which has the capacity to be genuinely excellent. We must be prepared to pay for the health care we want and patient enough to wait for it to be delivered in a timely fashion.

Related posts:

To read ‘With time running out’, click here

To read ‘Wither tomorrow?’, click here

To read ‘The NHS Emporium’, click here

To read ‘On Approaching One’s Sell By Date’, click here

To read ‘General Practice – is time running out?’, click here

To read ‘Friday, Bloody Friday’, click here

To read ‘On being overwhelmed’, click here

To read ‘On Not Remotely Caring’, click here

To read ‘Contactless’, click here

To read ‘An Audience for Grief’, click here

To read ‘Vaccinating to remain susceptible’, click here

To read ‘Eleanor Rigby is not at all fine’, click here

To read ‘The Abolition of General Practice’, click here

To read ‘General Practice – still a sweet sorrow’, click here

To read ‘The Life I Lead’, click here

To read ‘When “Good enough” isn’t good enough’ click here

To read ‘Something to reflect on – are we too narcissistic?’, click here

To read ‘Too busy to be happy?’, click here

To read ‘The NHS – the ‘S’ is for service, not slave’, click here

To read ‘On keeping what we dare not lose’, click here

To read ‘Bagpuss and the NHS’, click here

To read ‘Health – it’ll be the death of us. Is there institutional arrogance in the NHS?’, click here

To read ‘On being crazy busy – a ticklish problem’, click here

To read ‘From A Distance’, click here

To read ‘I’ll miss this when we’re gone’, click here

To read ‘Don’t forget to be ordinary, if you want to be happy’, click here

Blaming it on the Boogie

Recently The Guardian reported that doctors were alarmed that an online test, designed to estimate the cardiological health of those completing its short questionnaire, revealed that 78% of British adults had a heart age older than their chronological age. As such they were at risk of an early death.

What was even more alarming, at least for one Somerset man, was that despite having normal blood pressure, a cholesterol comfortably below five and a weight in the healthy range, the computer based algorithm insisted on saying ‘No’ when he asked the question as to whether he’d live to a ripe old age. Neither his lifelong avoidance of cigarettes, diabetes or atrial fibrillation, nor his good sense to have been born of parents whose genetic makeup promised an existence well into his 90s, managed to persuade the online ‘expert’ otherwise and, despite repeated questioning, it stubbornly continued to insist his heart was older than his actual 51 years.

What could be the explanation? All that was left was his post code. Like the rest of the country, Somerset has enjoyed several months during which each week was as warm and dry as the one preceding it – so much so that the BBC helpfully sent out an urgent alert informing the nation that the summer had indeed been hot. This got our worried west countryman wondering if the weather might be to blame. He was, however, quickly assured that neither the sunshine, nor the good times he had experienced of late, could have accounted for the accelerated ageing of his heart. Further questioning confirmed that his lifetime exposure to moonlight was also within normal limits thus leaving his passion for dancing to the music of Bacarra in the late 1970’s as the only possible explanation for his inevitable early demise.

So once again the great British public has been encouraged to fret about their mortality as leading doctors have expressed alarm that the vast majority of people have an older heart than their age would anticipate. But perhaps more alarming still is the fact that they are so alarmed. Once again the cry has gone up that everybody should have cardiological screening tests and thereby throw themselves on the mercy of the medical profession with the promise that, among those public spirited enough to do so, lives will be saved.

But, of course, lives will not be saved – at best they will only be prolonged. And though this may be of some value, one must ask the question as to quite how much can life be extended. The average life expectancy of our Somerset man is, apparently, 79.4 years, not a great deal more than the 79 years his ‘old’ heart promises.

And at what cost will this life extension be achieved. Not only is there the potential of adverse effects from the drugs that will be administered but also the very real emotional consequences of individuals being encouraged to constantly ruminate over their own health.

When normal healthy individuals are labelled as ill, it is no wonder we have the ‘worried well’. And nor is it any surprise that, busy reassuring those they have unnecessarily alarmed and treating them for conditions they do not have, doctors have no time left to attend to the genuinely sick.

This is a tune to which we can no longer dance – the obvious stuck record needs to be changed.

Of course some attention to one’s health is entirely appropriate but when NHS England suggests that only about 20% of us can expect to live a normal lifespan then clearly there is some confusion as to what ‘normality’ really means. When those whose health indices lie comfortably within accepted normal limits are still the recipients of dire warnings of a premature death then something has gone very wrong. And it is a sad day when those individuals are encouraged to spend the next 28 years anxiously fretting about their mortality rather than getting on with the far more worthwhile endeavours of contributing to society and enjoying the years they do have left to them.

Rather than introspectively bemoaning the fact that some of us will die aged 79, we would do well to be glad that we live in a nation where the average citizen is aberrant enough to have a life expectancy that exceeds that number.

Much has been written about how the heart age estimation algorithm exaggerates risk when blood pressure and cholesterol levels are not known, but even when these parameters are entered into the online tool alarmist results are still all too often calculated. One can’t help wondering if that is a consequence of a systematic over emphasis by medics of those parameters for which potentially modifying drug treatments are available. The upshot of such a constitutional bias is an overestimation of the medical profession’s importance and, inevitably, exaggerated profits for pharmaceutical companies. That no attention is given to other lifestyle considerations such as diet and exercise, areas which require no input from a medical professional and no pharmaceutical intervention, is curious to say the least.

Having said that, to get me on the dance floor does generally require a drug treatment of sorts. And if that’s what it takes to get me engaging in what is undoubtedly a good form of exercise then perhaps I could do worse than visit Somerset’s finest, a certain Dr Thatchers, whose advanced access arrangements are very advanced indeed. True the adverse effects of his remedies may result in my mistakenly imagining that ‘Yes Sir, I can boogie’ despite evidence to the contrary but, even so I might just find the whole experience a little more satisfying than once more entering data into a computer and traipsing off to the doctors in pursuit of a guarantee of everlasting life.

So I’m asking, ‘Are you dancing?’ Because if you are it is surely better than merely settling on (ah, ha, ha, ha) stayin’ alive.


Related blogs:

To read ‘The Abolition of General Practice’, click here

To read ‘General Practice – still a sweet sorrow’, click here

To read ‘On being overwhelmed’, click here

To read ‘General Practice – is time running out?’, click here

To read ‘Health – it’ll be the death of us. Is there institutional arrogance in the NHS?’, click here

To read ‘An Audience for Grief’, click here

To read ‘On Not Remotely Caring’, click here

To read ‘Contactless’, click here

To read ‘Vaccinating to remain susceptible’, click here

To read ‘On Approaching One’s Sell By Date’, click here

To read ‘Eleanor Rigby is not at all fine’, click here

AND I GUESS THAT’S WHY THEY CALL IT THE BLUES.

Like the one whose taste in music veers consistently and increasingly away from societal norms and thus is destined to spend too much time sat in darkened rooms accompanied only by an empty bottle and the conviction that only he or she knows how music really ought to sound, it can be a lonely experience seeing things differently to the majority.

Nevertheless, it needs to be said that it’s not unusual, in this vale of tears, for it to be hard to be human. Neither is it abnormal.

True there are others who share such a conviction but they are seldom welcome in polite society. Such is the heresy to which they hold that theirs is an opinion that can only be whispered to one another like those shared by the sad unfortunates who spend too much time weighing the relative merits of Blind Willie McTell over Kansas Joe McCoy. Theirs is not a viewpoint one is likely to hear heralded wholeheartedly by media outlets intent on portraying a world where happiness is a right. We live in a marketplace where fun sells and where sadness, therefore, must not be tolerated.

And so we are urged to clap along if we feel like happiness is the truth. Such is a popular song, a popular notion. But the truth isn’t determined by what is popular. Whilst it’s great, when you’re happy and you know it, to clap your hands, it’s not always possible.

Because the truth is that everybody hurts. Sometimes.

In his book, published in 1872, Samuel Butler imagined a land, Erewhon, where those who offended against that country’s law were treated as being ill, and those who were ill were looked upon as criminals. Imagine how such a story would play out in today’s Britain with all the medical advances that we enjoy 150 years on from when the novel was first written.

Citizens who failed to comply with the demand that everyone must be happy would be duty bound to be treated and thereby cured of their despair. Tears would prompt urgent calls for medical attention and duty doctors would have to offer countless emergency appointments to manage the sad. Anything that might legitimately lead to unhappiness would not be tolerated. To accept the inevitably of death would be frowned upon and the population would be encouraged to perpetually medicate themselves to prevent such an unacceptable outcome regardless of the adverse outcomes and futile nature of their attempts. Those who stubbornly insisted on remaining ill would suffer the ire of a disapproving state and be disciplined for their sickness record by those who employed them.

And even when death finally came, as still it surely would, it would, as much as possible, be swept unseen under the carpet. Rather than dying, people would be allowed only to ‘pass on’. Clocks would not all be stopped, telephones would not be cut off, dogs would not be silenced with a juicy bone. Instead, normality would go on uninterrupted, fun would continue unabated. Rather than unpleasant funerals being held with all their accompanying solemnity and unhelpful and distasteful grief, people would gather together for celebrations, every one of them attired in brightly coloured party clothes. Imagining death had therefore somehow been conquered, everyone would smile and pretend to be happy, all the while posting selfies of themselves to convince themselves, and others, that such was indeed the case. And those who failed to mask their sorrow, those who upset others by being too feeble minded to carry on without experiencing and expressing sadness, would be paraded before clinicians who themselves would be only too ready to label their grief as a sickness and medicate them for their evident ill health.

We must not allow such a world to exist. We must not be complicit in its creation. To admit the normality of sadness is not to deny its pain. On the contrary, to acknowledge the reality that to be human is to sometimes experience intense emotional distress is the first tentative step that must be taken if anyone is to somehow come to terms with their grief and to carry on despite their sorrow – even if that sorrow may last a lifetime. Because to live is not to exist without sadness but rather to feel that intense feeling alongside, and as fully as, all the other emotions that go to make a life.

Weeping is a part of our existence just as much as laughter. It is a sound we must not silence.

Sometimes everything is wrong – and when it is, it is still a time to sing along. To do so is to recognise and understand what we know we feel but might otherwise be unable to fully express. Like crying, to sing of our sadness is to give our feelings voice. Such is the power and importance of lament.

To sing of our sorrow is, perhaps, to refuse to deny how black our feelings are – even as, ever so slightly, we allow that darkness to be lightened.

THE UNCOMFORTABLE PROFESSIONAL

It’s not a new phenomenon but I can’t help thinking that this last year has, once again, seen the professionalism of general practitioners undermined still further. We are increasingly being treated as naughty children.Two issues have particularly highlighted this for me.

I used to think, perhaps naively, that it was just bank robbers and murderers who got sent to prison. But now it seems that, by virtue of my being, for CQC purposes, the registered manager of the practice in which I am partner, I couldn’t go to prison for the heinous crime of pouring a urine sample down the sink in my room despite the fact that, as far as I am aware, this cavalier attitude of mine, has never done anyone any harm. Furthermore I am advised that I could be up on fraud charges for wantonly consulting with an 85 year old lady at what is, for her, a more convenient time than the 7:40pm appointment she had booked under Advanced Access arrangements.

This is, and I hope you’ll excuse the strong language, blinking stupid.

We are having to do things for no other reason than someone, somewhere, demanding that we do. And we are being cowed into submission merely to satisfy their agenda and justify their existence.

And not only is it, and I’m getting really cross now, bloomin’ (yeah, I know!) stupid, it’s also depressing and anxiety provoking.

In his book, ‘Lost Connections’, on the causes of depression, Johann Hari makes the point that “human beings need to feel their lives are meaningful – that they are doing something with purpose that makes a difference”. He quotes a study from as long ago as the 1970s by Michael Marmot who, investigating stress in the workplace, found, perhaps counterintuitively, that ‘the lower an employee is ranked in the hierarchy, the higher were their stress levels’. It turns out that the less control you have on your work, the more stressed and you become. ‘When you are controlled, you can’t create meaning out of your work’. That’s increasingly becoming us in General Practice.

Hari described a group of people who worked in a bike store who, depressed and anxious as a consequence of being ordered around by their boss, decided to break away and set up their own bike store – one run along different lines. Decisions were made collectively and, by giving themselves autonomy and control over their work, they reaped huge psychological benefits for themselves.

So what of general practice? Like those bike store workers we too are being controlled by others and made to work in ways which we disagree with and in which we see no value. And it is depressing. But it’s not just about throwing urine samples down the sink and seeing patients at mutually convenient times that I’m referring to – it’s also so much of our clinical work.

Des Spence, writing in 2016 in the BJGP about the workforce crisis faced by General Practice dismissed attempts at managing an increasing workload by such measures as total telephone triage and Internet based consulting. Acknowledging that there is no substitute for a face to face consultation between doctor and patient, his solution to the problem was, therefore, that we must reverse the escalating patient demand in ‘today’s largely disease-free Britain’. But first we need to understand what is driving our patients’ health-seeking behaviour. His answer to this question makes for uncomfortable reading since he blames the clinical practice of we GPs who, as we medicalise the human existence, fuel health anxiety and thereby make patients increasingly dependent upon us

Spence goes on to rehearse the well known argument that we shouldn’t prescribe antibiotics for a sore throat since it only serves to encourage patients needlessly to return the next time they develop the symptom. But he expands the argument to antidepressants quoting the evidence that most of the observed benefit of antidepressants is merely the placebo response, with any actual benefits being marginal or non-existent. With, according to Cochrane, a NNT for SSRIs of 7, it follows that 86% of patients don’t benefit from their use. But, like antibiotic prescribing for sore throats Spence asserts that prescribing antidepressants for low mood has ‘a far-reaching cascade effect on our time’. So too, he says, does the prescribing of drugs such as opioids and gabapentinoids which have equally poor evidence for their effectiveness.

Warming to his theme, Spence then looks beyond prescribing to how unnecessary investigations and referrals generate still more work as further anxiety is created, for both patient and doctor, with the uncovering of each additional minor abnormality. He concludes that, rather than too few doctors, “there is too much medicine” and that “iatrogenic harm Is the spectre in today’s world of polypharmacy for all.”

His final paragraph rightly asserts that “the debate about workload in general practice should in reality be a debate about clinical practice. If we want to reduce stress and workload the solution is” he sees, “in our hands only. We need to prescribe less, intervene less, and refer less… by implementing non-prescribing policies, actively stopping medications, and analysing referral patterns. Nationally, GPs need to seize total ownership of primary care guidelines, and kick off the idiot aristocrat specialists who know nothing of primary epidemiology and project unrealistic guidance from flawed hospital-based research. Finally, good medicine can only be achieved through good access, and good access can only be achieved by less medicine.”

It’s powerful and inspiring stuff. And yet we still find it hard, or at least I do, to resist doing what in my heart of hearts I know all too often is not really what is required. Why? Because I’m a little too scared to say ‘No’ to the perceived wisdom, too eager to toe the line, too ready to settle for an easy life. Only that easy life is, of course, not easy at all. As previously stated, to be made to behave in ways one doesn’t want to is the way madness lies.

Wouldn’t it be great if general practice could be different? Really different – to go with what is true rather than what is too often uncritically accepted by society. But to do so we’ll have to be brave enough to think differently to what has become increasingly the consensus – namely that life is a medical problem – that medicine is the answer to the bulk of the problems that we are presented with.

As Bob Dylan sang “I’ll go along with the charade until I can think my way out”
But thinking your way out can sometimes be hard.

In his book, ‘How to think’, Alan Jacobs writes of how, once established, the consensus is hard to challenge because there is great comfort in sharing the commonly held position. He quotes Marilynne Robinson who suggests we have a “collective eagerness to disparage without knowledge or information” alternative or unpopular views “when the reward is the pleasure of sharing an attitude one knows is socially approved.” If this is true, as doctors we are, in the medical setting, predisposed, without thinking, to endorse the view that medicine is universally good because we know that those we are talking to are likely to share this view, and approve of us for so doing. This is particularly relevant when we talk to our patients who, by coming to us in the first place, have made it clear that they believe we have the answer to their problems. Simply by bringing their low mood to a doctor, our patients have decided that it is a medical problem, a view that has been encouraged perhaps by their friends and family and generally endorsed by society as a whole. And we tend to all too easily agree with our patients, even when we do them a disservice by doing so. And all the more as we do so love to be needed.

We are, in the moment of the consultation, invested in not thinking because, it would feel too uncomfortable to disagree because, as Robinson puts it, “unauthorised views are in effect punished by incomprehension…as a consequence of a hypertrophic instinct for consensus.”

Jacobs asserts that if we want to think, then we “are going to have to shrink that “hypertrophic instinct for consensus.” But, he says, ‘given the power of the instinct, it is extremely unlikely that [we will be] willing to go to that trouble”

Jacobs believes that the “instinct for consensus is magnified and intensified in our era because we deal daily with a wild torrent of what claims to be information but is often nonsense”. That is the certainly true in the medical world with the nonsensical demands that are too often unjustifiably imposed upon us. Jacobs quotes T.S. Eliot who, almost a century ago, wrote, “When there is so much to be known, when there are so many fields of knowledge in which the same words are used with different meanings, when everyone knows a little about a great many things, it becomes increasingly difficult for anyone to know whether he knows what he is talking about or not.” And in such circumstances, “when we do not know, or when we do not know enough, we tend always to substitute emotions for thoughts.”

That is, confused about what to believe, we will default to what feels comfortable and agree with the consensus, the perceived wisdom. Jacobs believes that “anyone who claims not to be shaped by such forces is almost certainly self-deceived.” We are social beings who need to feel accepted and, since agreeing feels good, we are prone to toe the line. “For most of us”, Jacobs suggests, “the question is whether we have even the slightest reluctance to drift along with the flow. The person who genuinely wants to think will have to develop strategies for recognising the subtlest of social pressures, confronting the pull of the ingroup and disgust for the outgroup. The person who wants to think will have to practice patience and master fear.”

So could we as General Practitioners do that? Could we practise patience and master fear and do things differently? Could we practice medicine in the way those bike shop workers did, resisting the ‘hypertrophic instinct’ for the medical consensus and with it the demand to behave in ways that are imposed on us by government, pharmaceutical companies and society as a whole? Could we instead make collective decisions on how to practice based on what we know as GPs to be true? And could we thereby give ourselves autonomy and control over our work and as a result bring about genuinely better health for our patients and real psychological benefits for ourselves.

I’d like to think we could. It’ll be uncomfortable – speaking the truth often is – but it would be professional.

And just think of the benefits.
We could even keep pouring urine down the sink!

IN LOVING MEMORY OF TRUTH

“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” George Orwell

The doctor-patient consultation has much to do with the determination of truth. First a true history needs to be taken – symptoms need to be listened to and interpreted carefully. False beliefs of what symptoms may represent need to be corrected as doctor and patient seek to come to a shared understanding of the true nature of their condition. Once a reasoned explanation of what is going on has been agreed upon, normality needs to be distinguished from pathology if the over medicalisation of life, so beloved of pharmaceutical companies, is to be avoided. And once a consensus of what is true has been established it needs to be acted upon accordingly – an honest discussion needs to be had as to what a course of treatment, pharmacological or otherwise, may genuinely have to offer. The truth of whether a course of antibiotics will benefit that troublesome cough, how much help an antidepressant will really offer somebody with depression or to what extent a patient’s cancer will respond to chemotherapy needs to be determined and explained to the patient based on the available medical evidence rather than either the wishful thinking of patient/clinician or the exaggerated claims of pharmaceutical companies. But in an increasing postmodern world, where no absolute truth is held to exist, and some truths are more convenient for some to hold than others, such certainty seems harder to define. Truth, it seems, is terminally ill and languishing on an outlying ward whilst a DNAR form is being hurriedly completed by those who will benefit most from its death. Truth is in need of some urgent intensive care. Coming to that shared consensus within the consultation is, therefore, becoming more and more problematic.

On January 2nd 1891 a 12 year old boy called William died. A little under four years later, on December 13th 1894, his brother Ernest followed suit. He was just 9 years old. You won’t have heard of them – indeed I wonder if anyone alive today remembers that either of them ever even existed. Yet a gravestone in a Lincolnshire churchyard testifies to the fact that they did – it stands in memory of the truth that once they were both very much alive. The gravestone reminded me that those I have no knowledge of were no less real for my ignorance of them. I am glad it was there for me to read.

It’s good to visit graveyards from time to time – and not just to visit the graves of those we have known and loved. It’s helpful to be reminded of the countless generations of people who have gone before us, and to remember that all have died having once lived, not so very differently to us. To forget them does not alter the reality of their once vibrant lives but, by ignoring their former existence, we are diminished ourselves.

We make a mistake if we think we are more important that those who have gone before us.
We make a mistake if we arrogantly imagine that how we see things today is inevitably so much more sophisticated than how our predecessors saw things in the past.
And we make a mistake if we forget that one day we too will die and lie forgotten by those who live on. We, and what we reckon, will be considered of little importance by the strangers who will one day walk amongst our gravestones.

A few miles away from that village churchyard is Lincoln Cathedral. There the invitation again goes out to remember more of those who have died. The heavy stone slabs confirm that death is no respecter of persons. Even the great and the good, rich enough or considered important enough to have their lives commemorated in such grand surroundings, know what it is to die tragically young. Selina Newcomen died on 15th January 1725 aged 29. Just six weeks later, on 25th February, her eight month old son, John, joined her in the grave.

A third graveyard lies within Lincoln Castle, a few hundred yards away from the cathedral. In the 19th century, the castle housed a Victorian Prison. Here the gravestones are less auspicious. Rising no more than a few inches above the ground, the stones are engraved with just the initials of the person whose grave they mark – along with the date on which they were executed. Priscilla Biggadike was hung at 9am on December 28th 1868 for the murder, three months earlier, of her husband, Richard. He had been poisoned with arsenic. She maintained her innocence right up to the point of her execution. Fourteen years later, Thomas Proctor, a lodger of the Biggadike’s at the time, confessed on his deathbed to having committed the murder. Ironically, just a stone’s throw away, Lincoln Castle holds a copy of the Magna Carta of 1215. Famously it promises to deny or delay right of justice to no one. On this occasion however, a misrepresentation of what was true ended in an awful injustice. When truth is absent, something important dies.

Discerning the truth is fundamental if right decisions are to be made, if justice is to prevail, if sensible actions are to be taken.
But for some the truth is sometimes inconvenient.

In his book ‘The Book of Laughter and Forgetting’ the Czech writer, and Nobel Laureate, Milan Kundera wrote, ‘The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting’. His point was that we need to fight to keep remembering what is true because there are those who would have us forget the truth, if indeed we were ever allowed to know it in the first place. Controlling what is believed to be true, controls those who believe it.

Throughout history the rich and powerful have always wanted to control what is remembered, so as to paint a version of events favourable to themselves. Some have used their wealth to buy the silence of those who know the truth, others have used their power to threaten and intimidate those who they do not want to speak. It is no different today. Hollywood has recently been rocked by the news of how one rich and powerful man sought to silence the women he assaulted by paying them large sums of money to sign ‘Non-Disclosure Agreements’ or by threatening them with career failure if they ever opened their mouth and spoke of what he had done to them.

Pharmaceutical companies are sometimes guilty of similar misrepresentations of the truth. Not only do they encourage us to interpret normality as disease, they would also have us believe that their drugs are more effective in producing satisfactory endpoints than they really are, imaginatively misrepresenting data and applying gagging clauses to those who undertake their research lest results of that research is unfavourable for the drug’s marketability.

If something is not said, it is soon forgotten, and what is not remembered is soon no longer believed – no matter how true it actually was. Truth then dies – it ceases to be important.

It is not only a version of history that powerful people want to manipulate. The notion of truth itself is something that some would like to see die – and be left with no memorial stone to mark its passing. Truth can indeed be inconvenient – it gets in the way of allowing us to do what we want. This wish, to see truth conveniently disposed of, is not a new desire – it’s been around for millennia. Nearly 2000 years ago Pontius Pilate, perhaps himself drawing on Plato, asked one who claimed to bear witness to the truth the question ‘What is truth?’ In the 19th century Friedrich Nietzche coined the term ‘Perspectivism’ and, presumably failing to notice his own internal inconsistency, asserted that ‘There are no facts, only interpretations’. And today we have so called ‘alternative facts’. Some, the rich and powerful, claim that these alternative facts, with no objective evidence to support them, have as much validity as facts that are objectively verifiable. Others just shout down, vilify and ridicule any opinion contrary to their own – ad hominem arguments being preferred to reasoned argument. The only thing that is true, it seems, is that there is no truth.

In ‘The Eighteenth Brumaire of Lois Bonaparte’, Karl Marx wrote: ‘Men make their own history; but they do not make it just as they please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves, but under circumstances directly found, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all the dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living.’ Marx’s point is that nobody stands outside of history – everyone, even the most progressive of thinkers, is influenced by the particular historical context they find themselves in. The thinking of those in the past was, without doubt, not without error but we are foolish if we think it was completely false. If we try to think in new ways, without drawing on the wisdom of the past, we ourselves will make mistakes influenced as we are by the time in history we find ourselves. We will make mistakes in the conclusions we draw, different mistakes, certainly, from those that have gone before us, but mistakes none the less. Novel ideas of the nature of reality are unlikely to be reliable. Truth matters – and it is best discerned standing on the shoulders of those who have thought before us rather than dismissing that body of understanding as irrelevant and out of date and trying to start afresh. C.S. Lewis advised that at least every fourth book one reads should be from an era prior to our own. He wrote, “Every age has its own outlook. It is especially good at seeing certain truths and especially liable to make certain mistakes. We all, therefore, need the books that will correct the characteristic mistakes of our own period. And that means old books.’

And it means old ideas too. That’s why we need to remember those who have gone before us – and learn from them. Those old and long retired GPs may not be talking out dated nonsense after all. Perhaps they are wiser than we would like to think. Perhaps we should listen more attentively to the advice they might have for us. If only we would ask it of them.

But still there are those who want to redefine truth for us, and make it fit modern sensibilities. If as is sometimes said, truth is the first casualty of war, then it would seem we have a fight on our hands – that the battle has been raging for a while. We must not uncritically buy in to the spirit of the age – uncritically believe what we are told. To do so will spell disaster. If we lose the notion of truth, then what place the news? Will there be any point in switching on our televisions at 10 o’clock each evening? And what will we hear if we do?

*****

THE SWEN AT TEN – A DAILY ROUND UP OF ALL YOU NEED TO FEEL

For those who find any meaning in arbitrary concepts of time: It’s 10pm on Senseday, the 38th of Imaginary, 2084 – here are the perspectives.

Our main story tonight is the inauguration of Liarnel Thump as the new President of the renamed ‘United Provinces of the Relevant World’. President Thump takes up his position after declaring himself as the populace’s undisputed choice of leader following his claiming a 98% approval rating amongst ‘right thinking’ people. Under new legislation that states that supporting evidence is no longer required before attesting such a claim, Thump’s taking power will proceed unopposed. Outstanding criminal charges against the President will not be considered since, as there is no such thing as right and wrong, crime is no longer considered a meaningful concept in a progressive society such as the UPRW. Those who have accused Mr Thump of ‘violating their personal space’ have been instructed to ‘feel differently about it’. Furthermore since it has long been felt by those in power that only the powerful can lawfully own property, those who assert that they have such a thing as personal space are open to a charge of larceny since they have no right to deny any space, personal or otherwise, from others. Legal teams are considering how ‘the unimportant’ might be charged with wrong doing in a blame free society where the concept of wrong is not recognised. Early indications are that the poor, the weak and the easily oppressed will be made exempt from immunity to prosecution to ensure the smooth running of society for those of significance. Similarly mental illness will no longer be acceptable. In a society that is deemed entertainment rich and where a fun filled future is considered guaranteed, low mood and anxiety will be classified as deviant emotions and those displaying such unhelpful and negative attitudes of mind will be subject to incarceration.

Former Prime Minister, Tony Blah, renewing his role as an envoy for peace today urged the government to support military action in response to the alleged chemical attack in Syria. He said people needed to remember that, just because no evidence was ever found that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, it didn’t alter the fact that he undoubtedly had the capacity to launch a nuclear attack on western targets within 45 minutes. Meanwhile President Putout maintained that no chemical attack ever took place in Syria and the very idea that it did was as ridiculous a notion as Russia ever using chemical agents against its own citizens. ‘Besides’, Putout added reassuringly, ‘believe me when I say to you, you know we Russians love our children too.’

Health news. Jeremy Stunt has promised to deal decisively with the fact that lazy overpaid doctors are the cause of the undeniably high mortality that inevitably befalls those who are admitted to hospital on a Sunday. With the news that 53% of those who merely visit patients at the weekends are now injured by doctors larking about on the wards, Stunt announced that he would act with the same care and diligence he applies to his personal financial concerns to ensure doctors would work longer hours for less pay. He also confirmed that 5000 new family doctors would be available a week next Thursday.

Dr Frank Trueman’s appeal at the National Court of Personal Opinion came to a premature close this morning when the former family ‘doctor’ refused to swear, on a copy of Judge Expedient’s Shopping List, to tell the post truth, the whole post truth and nothing but the post truth. The guilty verdicts passed against him for having exhibited Unlove and behaving in an Unaffirming manner therefore remain. Last month Dr Trueman was found guilty of these crimes by a jury of his more enlightened when he insisted that Twiggy Silthlike was dangerously underweight and should be refused the bariatric surgery that she, believing herself to be obese, desired and, therefore, demanded as her human right. The court had agreed that Miss Silthlike had suffered great harm from Dr Trueman’s assertions and agreed with her view that to be defined by her BMI of 15.4 was ‘personally limiting’. The court further agreed that her belief that she was overweight was one that she had an inalienable right to hold. ‘I will not allow my nutritional status to be determined on an arbitrary mathematical calculation related to my height and weight’ Miss Silthlike had said in a statement whispered from her bed of restricted consciousness at the initial hearing six weeks ago. Leading surgeon, Mr Dai Cutting, who subsequently performed the stomach bypass surgery, said he was proud to have acceded to his patients wishes and had no regrets over the consequences that had resulted from the procedure. Speaking on Miss Silthlike’s behalf, the family lawyer assured the public that, although her parents had been upset by suggestions that Twiggy’s failure to attend the hearing in person indicated that she may now be biologically challenged, they were comforted that Twiggy had previously stated that she would never desist from identifying as ‘alive’. Dr Tom Foolery, Chair of the National College for General Acquiescers, distanced the professional body from the beliefs of Dr Trueman. He assured the public that today’s young GAs were trained to wholeheartedly agree with their clients ideas, to reassure them that all their concerns are unfounded and to completely meet their every expectation.

In other health related stories, the annual conference of those with a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disposition took place today. It was described by those attending the event as a wonderful coming together of those on a journey of discovery seeking out the benefits inherent in living with alternative lung functionality. Hundreds packed the Assembly Rooms in Battersea to hear Toby Acco, self-appointed Professor of Respiratory Medicine at Neverton University, deliver the keynote address entitled ‘How to be happy with your haemoptysis’. Delegates then coughed, spluttered and wheezed their way through motions seeking to redress the balance resulting from the negative reporting of the consequences of smoking in years gone by. On hearing that no studies in the last thirty years had shown an association between COPDisp and cigarette consumption, a prankster, who had managed to slip past security, asked if this might be because ethical approval for such studies had not been granted in recent times for fear of upsetting smokers were a link to be proven. The question remained unanswered as the imposter was escorted from the hall. Outside the venue, a small gathering of the far right ‘Smoking may not be 100% good for you Party’ demonstrated. As she was dragged from the scene by police, one militant said that she was just a little concerned that, what with all the oxygen cylinders on display, the constant stopping to light cigarettes may pose a risk, not only to those who were smoking but also to those pushing the wheelchairs to the specially designated ‘Fume Rich Spaces’ that had been constructed for the use of those attending and provided by the pharmaceutical company, Gloxo who, along with their sister company, Cigarettes-R-Us, have been stalwart supporters of the conference for many years. A spokesman from London Fire Service dismissed the concerns of the protestors as trivial compared to the dangers inherent in denying an individual the right to do as they jolly well pleased and said that the bigotry displayed by those remonstrating had no place in modern Britain.

The Science Society of Camford Univeristy has been expelled from membership of the leading university’s Student Union. The Society has a reputation for insisting on reasoned argument and the application of logic as a basis for seeking to understand the universe. President of the Student Union, La La Littlethought, stated that such old fashioned views were no longer accepted in advanced institutes of education especially one with such an excellent reputation as Camford. The Science Society had been allowed representation at the Freshers Fair but only if they were prepared to share a stand alongside other organisations holding outmoded outlooks on life. Ms Littlethought confirmed that since The Science Society had felt unable to share space with The Flat Earth Society, and had therefore absented themselves from the event, they could no longer be considered a university approved organisation. A statement released by the Student’s Union press office concluded, ‘It’s such a shame that members of Science Society can’t accept that theirs is just one of many equally valid ways weak minded people choose to look at the world. They ought to consider homeopathy.’

Sport – and it’s now only three weeks till the Olympic Games. This will be the third games to be played since it was universally agreed by members of the International Olympic Committee that competitive sports are unhealthy pastimes since taking part in such activities can encourage the deluded belief that some people are better at some things than others. The IOC have announced that there will be a new event taking place at these games with ‘Watching grass grow’ being introduced alongside the already very popular ‘Waiting for paint to dry’ and ‘Considering one’s navel’. Tickets are still available for all three events. The IOC reassured the public that they were not planning the reintroduction of medals at the forthcoming games since it was felt that to reward one person’s performance over another would go against the fundamental Olympic principal that everybody is equal at everything. It was confirmed however that certificates of attendance would be issued to all participants along with a complete set of commemorative fridge magnets.

Australia have been awarded the cricket fair play award.

In entertainment news, Greenwood Studies have announced that a film version of the popular TV series ‘The Y Files’ is to begin production in the New Year. Who will play investigators Mully and Sculder in this new feature length version has yet to be announced but the producers have confirmed the tag line for the movie remains, as for the television show, ‘The truth is in You’.

This week’s National Referendum Result – after 27 years of being rerun weekly, today’s referendum has finally yielded a result in which a majority of the 13 people who voted elected that day should no longer follow night. The government confirmed that there would be no further referenda on the matter and that they would now act to enforce the new policy as soon as possible. Verity Doubtful is favourite to chair the cabinet committee responsible for implementation after her successfully delivering the ‘Black is White’ initiative last year.

And finally this evening, extreme weather has left vast areas of Bangladesh under water. Tens of thousands are dead and millions are without food and shelter. Some are suggesting that this is a false news story and of course Bangladesh is only a third world country but still, let’s keep our fingers crossed, bless them.

*****

Truth matters. When everybody decides on their own version of what is true based on nothing but what we feel on a matter, no opinion can be challenged as wrong and we all make ourselves out to be gods. It is inherently self-centred and sooner or later we will insist on others dancing to our tune. Society becomes fractured and directionless as no common values are held to be true by all and no distinction exists between the trivial and the important. The result is that those who are rich and powerful, those who can impose their version of reality on others most effectively, become tyrants with no means of being restrained.

The struggle today is to remember that some things are true and some things are not – no matter what the wisdom of the world tries to buy or bully us into believing. But it’s more than that – truth doesn’t need to be just remembered, it’s needs to be upheld. The notion that there is no such thing as truth, has survived infancy, made it to adulthood and is now enjoying comfortable middle age. Perhaps we can’t know everything fully, but some things we do fully know – and certainly more fully than is sometimes claimed. The truth is out there.

This is particularly true for doctors. We need to take responsibility for determining, as far as is possible from our training and experience what is true and relaying this honestly to our patients – even when that truth is unpopular with our patients or indeed inconvenient to ourselves. Of course there will be occasions when there are differences of opinion and when these occur they will have to be resolved honestly, and amicably, based on a thorough assessment of the available evidence. And it’s not only in our dealings with patients that we need to stand up for the truth – we also need to stand up to our political leaders. We need to ensure that no one believes the false reports of what underlies the current crises in the NHS – reports that some are perpetuating as they seek the demise of this much loved institution.

As professionals we have responsibilities to act professionally – we must speak the truth. If we are not known to be truthful, we cannot expect to be trusted. And when trust is lost the profession falls.

It was Aeschylus who wrote ‘In war, truth is the first casualty’. We live in a day when truth is under fire, when contrary opinion is ridiculed and reasoned argument is silenced with a raising of an angry voice and a dismissive wave of the hand. Truth must not die and become something that only once existed – an idea that is fondly remembered. We need to take care of truth, seek it out and visit it often. We need to nurture it and allow it to flourish. And we need to speak truth too. Because the truth, like a young life, is precious. And precious things are worth holding on to.

I sat in another churchyard – on a bench placed there a decade or so ago in memory of a girl in her early teens who had died. She had been killed when a driver, his judgement impaired by alcohol, had recklessly raced his car at excessive speeds and hit her whilst she walked home from the park one Sunday afternoon. It was a criminally stupid act with tragic consequences. In front of me was her grave. On it were some fresh flowers. I’m glad somebody remembers her – but I wish she’d never died at all.

WHEN THE GOING GETS TOUGH, WHAT ABOUT THOSE WHO DON’T FEEL TOUGH ENOUGH TO KEEP ON GOING?

I hope you’ll bear with me for a while but, I wasn’t born yesterday, I know you’ve a lot on and this is a little on the long side.

Recently I watched the BBC adaptation of ‘Little Women’. Despite the fact that it wasn’t the kind of programme I would naturally be drawn to, I enjoyed it and found it genuinely moving. Let’s just say, on a number of occasions I found myself affected by what I can only assume was a speck of dust in my eye. Watching it I was struck by the ability that the characters had to bear great hardship. On several occasions in the story, there were those who spoke of having to simply bear, together, the trials their were experiencing – trials that included the anxiety of having a relative away at war, the pain of experiencing a debilitating illness and the sorrow of having to look on powerlessly as a loved one died. Though only a story, this ability to accept suffering, and bear it together, has a place in real life too.

I wonder, however, if today we have lost our ability to bear with suffering, to sometimes simply endure what life throws at us. We have, perhaps, come to assume that we have a right to comfort and ease and, when that dream falters, have become accustomed to the NHS, and others, always being there to rush to our aid. We may even have foolishly developed the notion that there is no limit to the help that can be provided – that no problem needs to be put up with. If we have come to believe this however, we are deluded. If one thing in life is certain, it is that, to a greater or lesser extent, hard times will come to us all. And sometimes there is no earthly solution to the difficulties we face. Sometimes they simply have to be endured – maybe for weeks, maybe for years. Sometimes the pain just has to be borne.

In his book ‘The Uses of Pessimism and the Danger of False Hope’, Roger Scruton warns against what he calls ‘The best case fallacy’, the illusion that we are prone to believe that progress will inevitably bring about a future state of affairs when all will be well. ‘There is’, he writes, ‘a kind of addiction to unreality that informs the most destructive forms of optimism: a desire to cross out reality…and to replace it with a system of compliant illusions.’ Scruton advises that we act as a ‘scrupulous optimist’ might. Alongside other characteristics, Scruton suggests that a scrupulous optimist ‘knows the uses of pessimism’, that conscious awareness that things may well go wrong, and that we ‘live in a world of constraints’. Scrupulous optimists, he says, ‘like all rational beings’ take risks ‘as part of their desire to improve things’ but do so ‘always counting the cost of failure and evaluating the worst case scenario.’ They know that things sometimes go wrong and that they and those around them are limited.

Both those who are ill and those working in the health service to support them in their sickness need to have this healthy dose of pessimism. We aren’t always as tough as we would like to be and we can’t always assume that we’ll be able to cope. Simply demanding that we, or others, be more resilient, is not always either helpful or realistic. Demanding that we be more resilient can even add to our burden. When the problems really are too much, beyond what any of us can cope with, it’s OK to find ourselves broken and awash with tears. On those occasions we may simply have to bear the pain – and it won’t be pleasant.

Sometimes the problems are too many for even the most capable
Sometimes the problems are too complex for even the most wise.
Sometimes the problems are too heavy for even the most strong.

Every now and then a day will inevitably come along which is just too much – when the demands put upon us exceed that with which we are able to cope. Our best efforts to meet the overwhelming need drains us of every ounce of energy we posses. Sometimes we can be so overwhelmed that it can feel that our inability to deliver the impossible reflects negatively on us, that our failure to solve every problem suggests some moral failure on our part. But we need not feel like this. There is no shame in being asked for more than we have and only being able to give all that we’ve got. We are, after all, only human.

We’re not all #NHSsnowHeroes. Some of us didn’t have 4x4s with which to brave the roads, some of us didn’t walk 20 miles to work, and some of us didn’t work additional hours because we simply couldn’t. I am genuinely grateful for those who did but we must not berate ourselves for not doing what we could not. To make the mistake of thinking we can meet every need will only crush us more. We do not help ourselves by being that foolish.

We need to be more realistic, we need to be those ‘scrupulous optimists’. Of course the demands of all our jobs are often overwhelming and the recent flu epidemic and now this bad weather has made things harder still. When the calls for help from those who are sick just keep on coming, those in health care ought not be surprised that there are days when it is all too much. Sometimes that is simply the way that it is, the nature of the job – the nature, even, of existence. Whilst we might bemoan the actions of others, and let’s face it we’re all good at that, it is not always someone else’s fault that our day has been hard. Though their actions have not always helped, and not denying that we should press for change in how the NHS is run, not even the government is wholly responsible for the struggles the NHS is currently facing. We need to accept that sometimes, in the midst of a flu epidemic or in atrocious weather for example, the job of health care professionals will, as a consequence, be significantly harder. And whilst not encouraging a resigned fatalism, we need to accept that when it is, that harder time will have to be borne for a while, not only by those in the NHS but also by society as a whole. Complaining about it today won’t help anyone. On the contrary, what will help today is if we bear the problem together. Blaming others only serves to isolate us at the very time we need others alongside us.

Though it may cost us to do so, we need to support one another especially those who find the struggle hardest. That includes patents but also those with whom we work alongside. We must not demand that they are superhuman. If we aren’t very careful, exalting #NHSsnowheroes will become a new way of our playing an old game – that of playing God. Some of us aren’t always as resilient as we’d like to be, and when we aren’t we may be the ones who struggle the hardest and need help. I am fortunate to work in a practice where that support is found and I am grateful to all those I work with that that is the case. I am grateful that there are those who help me: other doctors, nurses, reception, admin and managerial staff – even patients, who for the most part appreciate the pressures the NHS is under – we’re all in it together. Sometimes I help others, sometimes others help me.

Medicine is a wonderful thing. It can ease many burdens – but not all. Like those who practice it, it has its limitations and will never bring about a world where sickness and death is no more. I am not suggesting that medicine should therefore stop trying to find new ways of alleviating suffering but none the less, it must maintain that healthy dose of pessimism that reflects the reality that not every need can be met, that nobody lives for ever. Doctors also need that healthy dose of pessimism. Sometimes we should go the extra mile but we mustn’t lose sight of our limitations, our inability to meet impossible demand and that even despite our best efforts, some of those who get sick will have bad outcomes..

Furthermore doctors need to be wise enough to know that sometimes the kindest thing that we can do is stop striving for a cure and not burden a patient more by constantly demanding that they get better. Sometimes, when there is no longer any earthly solution to sickness and disease, when medicine has reached its limit, we mustn’t be afraid to acknowledge our weakness and our inability to help as we would like. Even so, as we look on and watch our patients, even our friends and family, suffer and die, we will do well if we can still bear with them in their suffering, if we can share in their sadness and ‘weep with those who weep’.

So when the going gets tough, what about those who don’t feel tough enough to keep going? What about those who lack, for now at least, the necessary resilience? Do we demand they toughen up as we regale them of the superhuman efforts of the strong? No. Instead we pick them up and carry them just as far as we can because those who are overwhelmed by the avalanche of need are no less worth carrying than those who are sick.

I wasn’t born yesterday – but I may need to be borne tomorrow.
And when one day I am too heavy to bear – and that day will surely come – lay me down and, if you can, please bear with me a while longer. And I’ll try to do the same for you.
Because bearing things alone would be truly unbearable.

JUST IN CASE MEDICINE – THE DANGERS OF PRACTISING DEFENSIVELY

Children don’t die. Not in this country, not in this day and age. Or so we’d like to think. So when, tragically, a six year old does die, society is unsettled and needs to be reassured. Blame must be apportioned and those responsible must be punished and removed in order that the public’s misplaced confidence that nothing bad will ever happen can be restored.

Being a professional is to deal with uncertainty, to apply knowledge and wisdom in complex, never before experienced situations, to do what seems best in less than ideal circumstances. And that’s hard – mistakes will sometimes be made – bad things will sometimes happen. To need professionals is to acknowledge the uncomfortable truth that life, and death, is uncertain. And so there are those who would like to see the end of professionals, to have them replaced by an ever increasing barrage of rules and regulations, protocols and proformas, in the misguided belief that certainty exists, that what needs to be done is always clear, that a good outcome can be guaranteed for all.

Much has been written recently regarding the Hadiza Bawa-Garba case and not all of it has been sensitively handled. In all of our reflections on what has taken place we must not forget that at the very centre of all this are parents grieving a much loved son. Regardless of how uncomfortable we may feel about how a doctor has been treated we mustn’t forget who has lost most. Though I’m sure such is never intended, none of the battles we rightly feel compelled to fight should suggest in any way that the blame for doctors having problems lies with patients who are inconsiderate enough to become ill. Patients are not the enemy – we must not forget to show compassion to those who are hurting the most.

The response of some to recent events is that if doctors are to survive in what many perceive to be an increasingly hostile professional world, one in which doctors feel unsupported by the likes of the GMC, then they have no option other than to practise defensive medicine, that is ‘medical intervention without clinical indication to safeguard the doctors interests’. Recently I have read of those who openly admit to having admitted patients they wouldn’t have previously, just in case, for fear of some comeback on themselves were something to go wrong.

But to assert that practising defensive medicine is the answer is, I believe, a mistake. Such practise is bad for patients, bad for the NHS and bad for the medical profession as a whole.

Defensive medicine is bad for patients since, as well as being frequently inconvenient and often financially costly, it exposes them to unnecessary investigations which are themselves not without risk. Furthermore, defensive medicine burdens patients with unnecessary anxiety since, out of a doctor’s unwillingness to carry any anxiety his or herself, he or she is reluctant to give patients the appropriate reassurance they need.

Defensive medicine is bad for an NHS which can ill afford the expense of inappropriate referrals both in financial terms but also in respect to an already overstretched workforce. Ironically, to practise defensively and admit patients ‘just in case’ serves only to stretch still further our hospital colleagues with whom we say we sympathise and thereby add to the very set of circumstances that increase the likelihood of the errors that brought about in the first place the tragic circumstances that we were all recently debating. Never mind “#IamHadiza”, practise defensive medicine and we might as well tweet “#NotmyproblemHadiza”.

And defensive medicine is bad for the medical profession itself since to practise so is to practise unprofessionally. Being a doctor isn’t easy. To be clear, we all need to acknowledge our uncertainties and make decisions accordingly. We need to be conscious of how confident we feel at work and how the level of that confidence can fluctuate over time. When we are feeling confident and imagine we have finally mastered being a doctor, we need to be careful that we aren’t overly cavalier with our patients’ well being. And when we are feeling less confident and imagine we will never be able to convince anyone that we are really a doctor at all, we need to acknowledge that we may sometimes investigate, refer or admit patients more that we might have otherwise. Furthermore we need to accept that this is part of being a doctor, part of what it takes to remain in practice for 30 years rather than burning out with the stress of it all within six months. So of course there will be times when, because of our own limitations, we investigate, refer and admit that which in time it emerges we need not have. But that is not practising defensively – rather that is practising responsibly, something we should all be doing. Practising defensively is different to that in that its primary concern is the doctors welfare – it is the ultimate in being doctor centred. Like it or not, part of what it means to be professional is to be patient centred, to put our patients welfare before our own.

Thinking only of ourselves and not being willing to make a professional judgment, not being willing to do what’s best for our patients, not being willing to do what seems wise based on our years of training and experience, reduces us to the likes of the 111 protocols we so often delight to criticise and thus only serves to suggest that we are surplus to requirements.. Practising defensive medicine dehumanises us and plays into the very hands of those who would undermine the need for professionals at all.

In short, practising defensive medicine is dangerous.

.

DO WE CARE ABOUT SADNESS?

‘All men seek happiness, this is without exception’. So wrote Blaise Pascal in his Pensées. But despite his assertion, and our best efforts, too many of us, it seems, find only sadness.

The causes are many, but can perhaps be divided into the grief felt for the thing which is lost – the broken relationship, the missed opportunity, the faded dream – and the sorrow resulting from the fear that the future will bring no relief – the loss of hope itself. As C.S. Lewis wrote after the death of his wife, ‘I not only live each endless day in grief, but live each day thinking about living each day in grief’.

Undoubtedly some of our sadness is of our own making. Ovid, somewhat ungraciously, for surely we all make mistakes, once said that ‘What is deservedly suffered must be borne with calmness.’ Perhaps so, but that is, none the less, easier said than done. ‘But when the pain is unmerited’, Ovid continued, ‘the grief is resistless’.

Regardless then of the reasons for it, sorrow has the capacity to overwhelm us.

Despite the joys that are undoubtedly present, this is often a sad world, frequently a vale of tears. And regardless of the cause, the sorrow of sadness hurts. Frequently that pain, for want of anywhere else to take it, is brought to the GP. Without doubt, there is a lot of it about, and it cannot easily be dismissed with the psychological equivalent of ‘it’s probably a virus’ and a facile assurance that the feeling will soon pass.

What then are we to do?

First we need to make the right diagnosis – we need to distinguish normal sadness from pathological depression. The former, I believe, is by far the more common. And having made our diagnosis, we need to resist the temptation to medicalise normality, even if by presenting it to the GP, the person in front of us has themselves sought out a medical solution to their distress.

It’s then that we need to be truly general practitioners, super generalists even. In fact we need to be so general that we are not medical at all, since it is then that the labels of ‘doctor’ and ‘patient’ become barriers to what we really need to be – simply human.

Of course we all want to help and we may understandably want to offer what only we as medics can, namely medication – but to do so tells the patient they are wrong to feel the way they do, that their sadness is inappropriate when, in truth, it is nothing of the sort.

There is, perhaps, a better, though less comfortable remedy. We need to understand the sadness – even if we cannot fully explain it. Having recognised the normality of the sorrow ourselves, the sad patient in front of us needs to be helped to see the normality of their feelings too.

To those who are new to sadness this may come as a shock, especially in the entertainment rich and superficially upbeat culture we inhabit. Abraham Lincoln commented that ‘In this sad world of ours, sorrow comes to all; and, to the young, it comes with bitterest agony, because it takes them unawares.’ Rather depressingly, but perhaps accurately for some at least, Lincoln continued with, ‘The older have learned to ever expect it.’

I once met a patient who had joined my practice when her the one she had previously attended closed down. She came with a diagnosis of bipolar and was taking high doses of quetiapine and an SARI. I asked her what had happened to make her how she was and she told me a long story of physical and emotional abuse at the hands of her first husband. After listening while, I told her I didn’t think she was bipolar, that rather than having a disorder, her emotions were simply the normal response to her distress.

The woman said that I was the first person who had told her that she wasn’t mad to feel the way she did – something which she greatly appreciated. And over the following six months we stopped all her medication without any ill effect.

To acknowledge the normality of sadness is not to deny the intensity of the suffering – because it’s normal doesn’t make it any less awful. But only having acknowledged its normality can we truly accept the sadness, and allow the grief to be expressed without trying to explain it away.

After all, you can’t rationalise away that which is not irrational.

We like to solve problems – to ease suffering. But sometimes their is no pill to take away the distress, no wise insight that will alleviate the pain of sadness. To pretend otherwise is untruthful, unhelpful and unkind. As physical pain alerts us to something being wrong and indicates action must be taken, so too emotional pain can serve a similar purpose. Denying its normality, denying its usefulness, removes all hope of ever addressing it’s cause.

But sometimes, of course, the cause can’t be addressed – because there is no earthly solution, there is no going back, no doing things differently next time. Sometimes not even time will help. Sometimes the pain of sadness may go on and on.

In such circumstances we may well feel useless, but that’s not necessarily so. Knowing our inadequacy allows us to stop being doctors who can’t help, and allows us to become people who can – by entering a little into the grief of those with whom we sit. It’s good to share their sorrow, it’s helpful to ‘weep with those who weep’, because being alone in one’s sadness is too great a burden for anyone to bear

In ‘Out of Solitude’, Henri Nouwen wrote: ,

“When we honestly ask ourselves which persons in our lives mean the most to us, we often find that it is those who, instead of giving advice, solutions, or cures, have chosen rather to share our pain and touch our wounds with a warm and tender hand. The friend who can be silent with us in a moment of despair or confusion, who can stay with us in an hour of grief and bereavement, who can tolerate not knowing, not curing, not healing and face with us the reality of our powerlessness, that is a friend who cares.”

And perhaps that is exactly the type of GP who cares too.

AFTERWORD:

I wrote the above eight years ago when involved with somebody who was, back then, already experiencing a period of prolonged personal sadness – a sadness that continues today. Some of us may be familiar with the words of the psalmist who wrote, ‘Weeping may tarry for the night but joy comes in the morning’. I don’t doubt the truth of these words but the night for some has already been very long and the day still seemingly remains an eternity away.

Elsewhere in those ancient writings are chronicled the trials of Job, and the ineffectual efforts of his comforters who needed to learn what we too must appreciate – that sometimes it is best to simply ‘weep with those who weep’ rather than to try to argue the miserable out of their sadness or, worse still, point out the mistakes we think they have made to bring about their misery. Regardless of whether we believe in God, I think we can agree that there is wisdom here.

Regret and sadness have much in common. In my first year as a GP Principal I recall visiting a patient who had had severe diarrhoea and vomiting for a few days. He was sufficiently dehydrated to require admission and I requested an ambulance to attend within the hour. There was, uncharacteristically for those days, some delay in the ambulance attending, and sadly the patient suffered a cardiac arrest and died on route to hospital.

The next day I chatted to my partners about the case. All were supportive and quick to point out that I had acted appropriately, that, if anyone, the ambulance service was at fault and that the outcome would not have been any different even if the ambulance had attended earlier.

But the response that helped me most was that of my senior partner who simply acknowledged that it was tough when things went wrong and related an incident when he regretted a judgement he’d made some years previously. That such an experienced and respected GP could ‘regret with those who regret” was very comforting for me.

more recently still, I came across this quote:

‘Good judgment comes from experience. And experience? Well that comes from bad judgment.’.

It’s a humorous saying but not without some inherent truth. If we consider the sense of the two statements with a degree of logic we get the following syllogism: ‘If the avoidance of mistakes comes from experience, and experience comes from making mistakes, then the making of mistakes is necessary to gain the experience to avoid mistakes.’

Now I am aware that there are some flaws in both initial statements, the avoidance of mistakes doesn’t only come from experience, and experience doesn’t only come from making mistakes, but for all that, since we are all flawed individuals, I think it remains the case that we learn much from our inevitable mistakes – mistakes that are maybe even necessary to make us more experienced and thereby better doctors. Experience comes over time so older doctors perhaps know this best – and know too what it is to experience the associated regret. Like Lincoln suggested of sadness, so older doctors have perhaps come ever to expect regret.

And if mistakes and regret are an inevitable but necessary part of being a doctor, then perhaps sadness is an equally inevitable and necessary part of being human. If mistakes and regret make us better doctors, maybe then sadness has the capacity to make us better people.

Perhaps wisdom is acknowledging this to be the case and, rather than trying to always avoid it or rationalise it away. learning to accept that life is sad.

If so, I wish I were that wise.

THE ABOLITION OF GENERAL PRACTICE

Aristotle had it right when he asserted in his ‘Metaphysics’ that ‘Those who wish to succeed must ask the right preliminary question’. More than 2000 years later, doctors would do well to listen to his advice. Before adopting each and every new advance that claims to be good for our patients, we should ask what we are hoping to achieve by following such recommendations. And we ought to consider whether the answer we come up with tallies with what I would propose might, in Aristotle’s eyes, be a good preliminary question to ask ourselves: ‘What do good doctors do?’

In ‘The Abolition of Man’, C.S. Lewis had some interesting things to say about how the focus of what science seeks to do has changed over time. Whereas once ‘wise men of old’ sought knowledge in order to understand how humankind conformed to reality, Lewis suggested that for science the problem had become ‘how to subdue reality to the wishes of men’. Furthermore he contended that there were dangers inherent in such an ambition. He realised that it would be those with power who would impose their wishes on the weak and maintained that any attempt to subdue reality to the wishes of the powerful would require nature to be conquered in order that it conformed to their desires. That, he said, would require a reducing of all of nature to nothing but it’s component parts, denying anything beyond the merely physical and quantifying everything only in terms of what we can measure. Lewis believed that, since humanity is itself a part of nature, this diminishing of the whole would ultimately diminish humanity and bring about what he called the ‘abolition of man’.

So what of medicine today? Does it also seek to go beyond trying to help patients face what nature throws at them and seek to conform nature to what is deemed desirable for our patients? And if so, is the result a diminishing of what it means to be human – are people reduced to being defined merely in terms of their medical parameters? Is medicine undermining what it is to be alive?

If the answers to any of these questions is ‘Yes’, the route cause may be that we doctors have lost sight of what our purpose really is. We have forgotten to ask ourselves the right preliminary question.

The NHS came into existence in 1948 based on William Beveridge’s 1942 report urging universal access to health care. This was accompanied by a belief that the state should provide social security ‘from the cradle to the grave’. Inherent then, at the inception of the NHS, was a belief that, though every effort should be made to fight disease and promote health, the grave awaited us all, death was an inevitable reality. In the early days of the NHS therefore, alongside social reformers who developed polices to reduce the risk of disease, the wise doctors of old practised medicine for a population of people with disease whilst never forgetting that death remained a reality that could not be ignored. That was what wise doctors did. But having forgotten this we have moved beyond this worthy endeavour and foolishly sought to employ medicine to subdue reality to mankind’s wishes. A moment’s thought will bring to mind a number of ways in which medicine has tried to do this and it will be all too apparent that this has often required the reducing of humans to nothing more than their component parts.

Take for example, perhaps man greatest desire, the wish to live happily forever after. Even though for medicine to deliver this is the stuff of fairy tales, medicine has, none the less, attempted to subdue the reality of death and unhappiness. No longer content to busy ourselves caring for the sick we now, in the name of promoting immortality, label the healthy ill. Those we consult with may never have felt so well but we tell them they have borderline hypertension, that their cholesterol is on the high side, and to top it all that they have pre diabetes. We tell them they should worry. We tell them they might die. Defining them in terms of unfavourable health indices, we then exhort them to take our medications with all their side effects and demand that they behave in ways they would not otherwise chose.

And if they fail to be happy, if they become anxious or sad, we try to convince them that their feelings are not really their own, that they have not experienced a genuine emotion but rather a conditioned response to the levels of serotonin floating around their biological system. And that there’s a pill for that too.

Slowly but surely, people become patients who, rather than being enabled to live well, are reduced to little more than automaton whose only concern is nothing more than to avoid death and feel pleasure. They are made to worry over what is normal and become dependent on medicine to solve the problems that they do not have. Their lives are diminished by the pursuit of what we have told them they should desire most.

Lewis, it seems, was right. But it’s not just our patients who are at risk. If we in primary care forget what it is we do and capitulate to those in power who seek to impose their ideas on how we practise medicine, if we buy in to their vision and are reduced to only being interested in what can be measured, if we spend our time frantically generating the data they demand, then we will no longer be the doctors we once were, the doctors we always wanted to be.

‘What do good doctors do?’ It’s a question we must urgently ask ourselves lest the answer become that we silently watch over the abolition of general practice.